Texas Longhorns Football vs Florida Gators Football Match Player Stats
Texas Longhorns Football vs Florida Gators Football Match Player Stats provide a detailed look at how Florida defeated Texas 29-21 on October 5, 2025. The final score tells only part of the story. The player statistics show a game shaped by Florida’s stronger rushing production, efficient passing from DJ Lagway, six Texas sacks allowed, and two interceptions thrown by Arch Manning.
The matchup was played in the SEC as both programs continued their 2025 seasons. Texas entered the game with a 3-2 record and an 0-1 conference mark, while Florida came in at 2-3 overall and 1-1 in SEC play. By the end of the afternoon, Florida had improved to 29 points while Texas managed 21.
For readers studying the box score, the most important takeaway is that this was not simply a case of one quarterback outperforming another. Florida won several statistical battles that combined to create the eight-point margin. The Gators ran for 159 yards compared with only 52 for Texas, recorded six sacks compared with none for the Longhorns, and intercepted Manning twice.
At the same time, Texas produced several individual performances worth examining. Manning threw for 263 yards and two touchdowns, DeAndre Moore Jr. averaged 25 yards per reception, and Anthony Hill Jr. recorded 14 tackles. Those numbers help explain why the Longhorns remained competitive even though Florida controlled several important areas of the game.
Texas Longhorns Football vs Florida Gators Football Match Player Stats
The following table summarizes the leading individual performers from the supplied ESPN box-score data.
| Category | Texas | Florida |
| Passing Leader | Arch Manning | DJ Lagway |
| Passing | 16/29, 263 yards, 2 TD, 2 INT | 21/28, 298 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT |
| QBR | 70.5 | 94.0 |
| Rushing Leader | Arch Manning | Jadan Baugh |
| Rushing | 15 carries, 37 yards | 27 carries, 107 yards, 1 TD |
| Receiving Leader | DeAndre Moore Jr. | Dallas Wilson |
| Receiving | 3 receptions, 75 yards | 6 receptions, 111 yards, 2 TD |
| Defensive Leader | Anthony Hill Jr. | Tyreak Sapp |
| Tackles | 14 | 6 |
| Team Sacks | 0 | 6 |
| Team Interceptions | 1 | 2 |
| Final Score | 21 | 29 |
The table immediately highlights the contrast between the teams. Texas had productive passing plays, but Florida was more efficient through the air and substantially better on the ground.
How the Game Was Decided
Florida’s 29-21 victory can be understood through four major statistical differences.
First, the Gators produced 159 rushing yards on 37 attempts. Texas managed only 52 rushing yards on 26 attempts. That represents a difference of 107 rushing yards.
Second, Florida was more efficient passing the football. Lagway completed 21 of 28 attempts for 298 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. Manning completed 16 of 29 attempts for 263 yards, two touchdowns, and two interceptions.
Third, Florida’s defense created pressure. The Gators recorded six sacks and seven tackles for loss. Texas recorded zero sacks and three tackles for loss.
Fourth, Florida won the turnover margin based on interceptions and fumbles recorded in the supplied statistics. Texas threw two interceptions but also recorded one interception defensively. Florida threw one interception and recorded two defensive interceptions. The Gators also lost one fumble.
These differences matter because they reveal how the final score developed. Texas was capable of moving the ball through the air, but Florida combined more balanced offense with greater defensive disruption.
Florida’s Offensive Advantage
Florida’s offensive statistics were more balanced than Texas’ production.
The Gators finished with 298 passing yards and 159 rushing yards. Texas, by comparison, recorded 289 passing yards and 52 rushing yards.
That means Florida generated 457 yards across the two primary offensive categories listed in the supplied data, while Texas produced 341.
The 116-yard difference is significant.
It also shows why focusing only on quarterback passing totals can be misleading. Manning’s 263 passing yards were respectable, and Texas finished with 289 team passing yards. Yet Florida had an additional dimension on the ground that Texas could not match.
Jadan Baugh’s 107 Rushing Yards
Jadan Baugh was Florida’s leading rusher with 27 carries for 107 yards and one touchdown.
His 4.0 yards per carry average was an important part of Florida’s offensive consistency. His longest run was 16 yards, which suggests that his production was not dependent on one extremely long breakaway play.
Instead, the supplied statistics show a substantial workload combined with steady production.
Twenty-seven carries is also more rushing attempts than Arch Manning had for Texas. Manning led the Longhorns in rushing with 15 attempts for 37 yards, but his 2.5-yard average was considerably lower.
The contrast between the two rushing leaders is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the final result.
DJ Lagway’s Efficient Passing
DJ Lagway completed 21 of 28 passes for 298 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception.
His completion rate was 75 percent, calculated from 21 completions on 28 attempts. Manning completed 16 of 29 attempts, which works out to approximately 55.2 percent.
Lagway also posted the higher listed QBR, at 94.0 compared with Manning’s 70.5.
The efficiency difference becomes even more meaningful when combined with the rushing statistics. Florida did not need to rely exclusively on Lagway to win the game. The Gators had a productive rushing attack and a quarterback who completed three-quarters of his attempts.
That combination made Florida’s offense more difficult to defend.
Dallas Wilson Was Florida’s Biggest Receiving Threat
Dallas Wilson led Florida’s receiving production with six receptions for 111 yards and two touchdowns.
His average of 18.5 yards per reception demonstrates the explosive nature of his contribution. His longest reception was 55 yards.
Most importantly, both of Florida’s passing touchdowns came through Wilson according to the supplied player statistics.
That gives Wilson a direct connection to the final score. Florida scored 29 points, and Wilson accounted for two receiving touchdowns.
His production was also efficient in terms of volume. Six receptions produced 111 yards, meaning Florida did not need to feed him an unusually large number of targets to generate major yardage.
Florida’s Receiving Numbers Were Well Distributed
Florida finished with 21 receptions for 298 yards, an average of 14.2 yards per reception.
Wilson’s six catches therefore represented less than one-third of Florida’s completed passes, while his 111 yards accounted for a substantial share of the team’s receiving production.
This is important when interpreting the box score. A receiving leader does not necessarily represent the entire passing offense. Lagway’s 298 passing yards were distributed across multiple completions, while Wilson supplied the biggest scoring impact.
Texas Offense: Productive Passing, Limited Rushing
Texas finished with 289 team passing yards on 17 completions and 32 attempts.
That works out to a 53.1 percent team completion rate.
The Longhorns averaged 9.0 yards per passing attempt based on the supplied team statistics, which is a strong figure. However, the passing attack also included two interceptions.
That combination explains the mixed nature of Texas’ offensive performance.
The Longhorns could create significant yardage through the air, but turnovers and weak rushing production reduced the overall effectiveness of those gains.
Arch Manning’s Passing Performance
Arch Manning completed 16 of 29 passes for 263 yards, two touchdowns, and two interceptions.
His listed average was 9.1 yards per attempt, with a QBR of 70.5.
There is an important distinction between efficiency in yardage and efficiency in possession management. Manning’s 9.1 average shows that his completed passing plays generated meaningful yardage. However, the two interceptions created additional possessions for Florida and limited the value of some of that production.
The numbers therefore tell a balanced story.
Manning was not ineffective as a pure yardage producer. He threw for 263 yards and two touchdowns. But the two interceptions and Florida’s six sacks created significant obstacles.
DeAndre Moore Jr. Provided Big-Play Production
DeAndre Moore Jr. led Texas in receiving with three catches for 75 yards.
His 25.0-yard average was the highest listed receiving average among the leading players in the supplied statistics.
His longest reception went for 42 yards.
Moore’s numbers illustrate how Texas generated explosive plays despite having fewer total offensive yards than Florida. Three catches for 75 yards is a relatively low-volume but high-impact receiving performance.
The key issue for Texas was converting that type of explosive production into sustained offensive success.
Texas Rushing Was the Major Statistical Weakness
Texas rushed 26 times for only 52 yards.
The team averaged 2.0 yards per carry.
That figure stands in sharp contrast to Florida’s 4.3-yard rushing average.
The difference was not marginal. Florida gained 159 rushing yards compared with 52 for Texas.
This created a major structural problem for the Longhorn offense. When a team is struggling to generate rushing yardage, the passing game can become more important. But that can also expose the quarterback to greater pressure.
The supplied defensive statistics show exactly that pressure problem. Florida recorded six sacks.
Arch Manning’s Rushing Numbers
Manning led Texas in rushing with 15 carries for 37 yards.
His longest run was 36 yards, meaning almost all of his rushing yardage came from a particularly significant play.
Without that 36-yard run, his remaining 14 carries would have produced only one yard based on the supplied figures.
That is an important box-score observation because the headline average of 2.5 yards per carry does not fully describe the distribution of his production.
It also reinforces the broader point that Texas lacked consistent rushing production.
Defensive Comparison
The defensive statistics reveal one of the biggest differences between the teams.
Texas recorded 87 total tackles, 27 solo tackles, three tackles for loss, and zero sacks.
Florida recorded 50 total tackles, 24 solo tackles, seven tackles for loss, and six sacks.
The tackle totals should not be interpreted in isolation. Texas having more total tackles does not automatically mean the Longhorn defense played better.
A high tackle total can occur when a defense spends more time on the field or allows more completed plays. The more revealing numbers here are sacks and tackles for loss.
Florida generated six sacks and seven tackles for loss.
Texas produced zero sacks and three tackles for loss.
That indicates a clear advantage for Florida in backfield disruption.
Anthony Hill Jr. Led Texas in Tackles
Anthony Hill Jr. recorded 14 tackles, including three solo tackles.
He did not record a sack or tackle for loss in the supplied statistics.
His 14 tackles were more than twice the number recorded by Florida’s leading tackler, Tyreak Sapp.
Hill’s performance is useful for understanding Texas’ defensive workload. A player reaching 14 tackles indicates that he was repeatedly involved in stopping Florida’s offensive plays.
However, his individual tackle production did not translate into enough negative plays to prevent Florida from gaining 457 combined passing and rushing yards.
This is an important distinction between volume statistics and impact statistics.
Tyreak Sapp and Florida’s Defensive Pressure
Tyreak Sapp led Florida with six tackles.
He also recorded one tackle for loss.
While Sapp did not record a sack, his contribution came within a defense that collectively generated six sacks.
The defensive story was therefore less about one dominant individual and more about Florida’s ability to create pressure as a unit.
Six sacks is particularly important in a game where Texas’ rushing offense averaged only 2.0 yards per attempt.
Florida could challenge Texas in both phases of the offense: the run defense restricted rushing production, while the pass rush created six sacks.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers were another important part of the game.
Texas recorded one interception defensively through Michael Taaffe.
Florida recorded two interceptions, with Jordan Castell returning one for 18 yards and Devin Moore recording another.
On offense, Texas’ Manning threw two interceptions.
Lagway threw one interception.
Florida also had two recorded fumbles, losing one. Hayden Hansen was charged with one fumble that was lost, while Dallas Wilson recorded one fumble that was not lost.
Texas recorded no offensive fumbles in the supplied data, while Anthony Hill Jr. was credited with one fumble recovery.
The turnover information is therefore more complicated than simply saying Florida was perfect with the football. The Gators did have a lost fumble.
However, Florida’s two defensive interceptions compared with Texas’ one gave the Gators an important advantage in the interception category.
Kicking Made a Difference
Special teams also contributed directly to the scoring.
Florida kicker Trey Smack made both of his field-goal attempts, including a longest field goal of 38 yards.
He also converted all three extra-point attempts and finished with nine points.
Texas kicker Mason Shipley converted all three extra-point attempts for three points. Texas attempted no field goals according to the supplied statistics.
The difference was therefore six kicking points in favor of Florida.
Florida’s 29 points included nine from Smack.
Texas scored 21 points, with Shipley contributing three.
The kicking statistics matter because Florida’s field goals helped build its first-half advantage without requiring touchdowns on every scoring possession.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The quarter scoring shows that Florida built its lead early and Texas was unable to overcome it.
First Quarter
Florida scored 10 points in the opening quarter.
Texas scored zero.
That gave the Gators an immediate 10-0 advantage.
A fast start can influence play calling and game management because the trailing team is often forced to pursue points rather than simply maintain balance.
Second Quarter
Texas scored seven points in the second quarter.
Florida added nine.
At halftime, Florida had a 19-7 advantage.
The nine-point second quarter for Florida was particularly valuable because it prevented Texas from cutting deeply into the early deficit.
Third Quarter
Both teams scored seven points in the third quarter.
Florida therefore maintained its 12-point halftime lead entering the final period.
Fourth Quarter
Texas scored seven points in the fourth quarter.
Florida scored zero.
This was the strongest quarter for Texas from a scoring perspective because the Longhorns outscored Florida 7-0.
However, the early deficit proved too large to erase.
The final scoring sequence produced a 29-21 Florida victory.
What the Box Score Says About Each Quarter
The quarter totals create a clear game script.
Florida dominated the opening half.
Texas improved offensively after halftime.
Florida did not score in the fourth quarter, but its earlier production was enough to preserve the win.
This is why the final score should not be interpreted as an evenly balanced 60-minute performance. Texas finished with a strong fourth-quarter scoring result, but Florida had already created enough separation.
Special Teams and Field Position
Texas punter Jack Bouwmeester recorded six punts for 236 yards.
His average was 39.3 yards, with a longest punt of 62 yards. Three of his punts resulted in touchbacks.
Florida punter Tommy Doman Jr. recorded five punts for 195 yards.
His average was 39.0 yards, with a longest punt of 51 yards. Two punts went inside the 20-yard line, and he recorded no touchbacks.
The overall punting averages were nearly identical.
The difference came in the details.
Doman’s two punts inside the 20 indicate stronger recorded placement in those opportunities, while Bouwmeester’s three touchbacks show a different type of field-position result.
Neither punting line alone explains the outcome, but these numbers help complete the special-teams picture.
Return Game
Florida’s Vernell Brown III returned four kickoffs for 52 yards, averaging 13.0 yards per return.
His longest return was 21 yards.
Texas had no kick returns recorded in the supplied data.
In the punt return category, Texas’ Ryan Niblett recorded one return for 10 yards.
Florida had two punt returns for three yards, averaging 1.5 yards per return.
The return game was therefore not a major source of explosive scoring production for either side, but the statistics show Florida had more recorded kickoff-return activity.
Texas Longhorns Football vs Florida Gators Football Match Player Stats: The Most Important Numbers
Several statistics stand above the rest when evaluating this matchup.
1. Florida rushed for 107 more yards
Florida:
159 rushing yards
Texas:
52 rushing yards
This was arguably the clearest team-level statistical advantage.
2. Florida recorded six sacks
Florida:
6 sacks
Texas:
0 sacks
This was the biggest defensive disruption difference in the box score.
3. DJ Lagway completed 75 percent of his passes
Lagway:
21 of 28
Manning:
16 of 29
The completion-rate difference was substantial.
4. Florida had two interceptions
Florida’s defense intercepted Manning twice.
Texas intercepted Lagway once.
5. Dallas Wilson scored twice
Wilson finished with six catches, 111 yards, and two touchdowns.
Those touchdowns were a major part of Florida’s scoring output.
6. Jadan Baugh surpassed 100 rushing yards
Baugh:
27 carries
107 yards
1 touchdown
He provided the consistent rushing production that Texas struggled to generate.
Why Texas Still Reached 21 Points
It would be inaccurate to describe Texas as completely shut down.
The Longhorns passed for 289 team yards and scored three touchdowns based on the supplied scoring-related statistics.
Manning threw two touchdown passes.
Moore produced 75 receiving yards on only three catches.
Texas also scored seven points in both the second and third quarters and another seven in the fourth.
The offensive problem was not the complete absence of explosive plays.
Instead, Texas lacked consistency.
The combination of 52 rushing yards, two interceptions, and six sacks allowed made it difficult for the Longhorns to maintain the same offensive efficiency that Florida displayed.
Why Florida Won Despite Its Own Mistakes
Florida was not flawless.
The Gators recorded two fumbles and lost one.
Lagway threw one interception.
The team also scored zero points in the fourth quarter.
Yet Florida’s earlier performance created enough margin to survive those mistakes.
The Gators’ 29 points were built through multiple avenues:
- Two passing touchdowns
- One rushing touchdown
- Two made field goals
- Three successful extra points
This scoring diversity matters.
Florida did not depend entirely on one player or one type of scoring play.
A Deeper Look at Offensive Efficiency
The most useful way to interpret this box score is to separate volume from efficiency.
Texas had 17 completions for 289 team passing yards.
Florida had 21 completions for 298 yards.
The passing-yard difference was only nine yards at the team level.
That may initially make the passing performances look nearly equal.
But the efficiency and turnover numbers tell a different story.
Florida completed 75 percent of its passes.
Texas completed approximately 53 percent.
Florida threw one interception.
Texas threw two.
Florida therefore gained almost the same amount of passing yardage with fewer attempts, a higher completion rate, and one fewer interception.
That is a meaningful offensive efficiency advantage.
The Rushing Gap Changed the Entire Offensive Picture
The passing numbers become even more revealing when rushing is added.
Florida’s 159 rushing yards gave the Gators a strong second offensive source.
Texas had only 52.
The Longhorns therefore produced 341 combined passing and rushing yards from the supplied team statistics, while Florida produced 457.
That 116-yard total offense difference is much larger than the nine-yard difference in passing yardage.
In other words, the matchup was not primarily decided by Florida throwing for dramatically more yards.
It was decided by Florida adding much more production on the ground.
The Defensive Story Is Equally Important
Florida’s six sacks were a major reason Texas struggled to sustain offense.
A defense can limit an opponent without producing sacks, but six sacks represent substantial disruption.
Texas, by contrast, recorded zero sacks against Lagway.
That allowed Florida’s quarterback to operate without the same level of backfield pressure reflected in Texas’ defensive statistics.
The Longhorns did record 87 total tackles, but tackle volume did not compensate for the lack of sacks and the limited number of tackles for loss.
Individual Performances Worth Remembering
The box score contains several standout performances.
DJ Lagway
21 completions on 28 attempts
298 passing yards
2 touchdowns
1 interception
94.0 QBR
Lagway combined efficiency with production.
Jadan Baugh
27 carries
107 rushing yards
1 touchdown
4.0 yards per carry
Baugh supplied Florida’s most important rushing contribution.
Dallas Wilson
6 receptions
111 yards
2 touchdowns
18.5 yards per reception
Wilson provided the game’s most direct receiving scoring impact.
Arch Manning
16 completions on 29 attempts
263 passing yards
2 touchdowns
2 interceptions
15 carries
37 rushing yards
Manning contributed as both a passer and runner but faced significant defensive pressure.
DeAndre Moore Jr.
3 receptions
75 yards
25.0 yards per reception
Moore supplied one of Texas’ most explosive receiving performances.
Anthony Hill Jr.
14 tackles
3 solo tackles
Hill was Texas’ leading tackler.
Tyreak Sapp
6 tackles
2 solo tackles
1 tackle for loss
Sapp led Florida individually in tackles.
What Future Box-Score Readers Should Watch
When evaluating similar college football games, the best approach is not to focus on one headline statistic.
Instead, examine the interaction between categories.
Start with passing efficiency.
Then check rushing production.
Next, look at sacks and tackles for loss.
After that, review turnovers.
Finally, examine scoring by quarter.
This approach gives a more complete explanation of why a team won.
For this particular matchup, that method points consistently toward Florida.
The Gators were more efficient passing, substantially better rushing, more disruptive defensively, and better at creating interceptions.
Common Misreadings of This Box Score
One common mistake would be to say Texas’ passing attack was poor simply because the Longhorns lost.
The numbers do not support such a simple conclusion.
Texas generated 289 team passing yards at 9.0 yards per attempt.
Another mistake would be to focus only on total tackles.
Texas recorded 87 total tackles compared with Florida’s 50, but Florida recorded six sacks compared with none for Texas.
A third mistake would be to ignore the quarter scoring.
Texas outscored Florida 7-0 in the fourth quarter, but Florida’s 19-7 halftime lead remained decisive.
A fourth mistake would be to treat all 100-plus-yard performances as equally important.
Baugh’s 107 rushing yards came with 27 carries and a touchdown, giving Florida sustained ground production. Wilson’s 111 receiving yards came with two touchdowns, making his contribution especially important to the scoreboard.
Data Notes for Readers
The statistics analyzed here are based on the supplied ESPN box-score data for the October 5, 2025 Florida Gators versus Texas Longhorns matchup.
Some team totals and individual totals should be read at their appropriate level.
For example, Texas is listed with 17 completions for 289 passing yards, while Manning is credited with 16 completions for 263 yards. This indicates that another Texas passer contributed to the remaining team passing production.
Likewise, Florida’s team passing statistics match Lagway’s listed passing line.
The article intentionally does not add statistics that were not provided.
That distinction matters when producing a reliable game analysis. A box-score article should separate verified supplied figures from interpretation rather than filling gaps with assumptions.
FAQs
Who was the leading passer in the Texas vs Florida game?
DJ Lagway was Florida’s leading passer, completing 21 of 28 attempts for 298 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. Arch Manning led Texas with 263 passing yards, two touchdowns, and two interceptions.
Who led the game in rushing?
Florida’s Jadan Baugh led the rushing statistics with 27 carries for 107 yards and one touchdown. Texas was led by Arch Manning, who rushed 15 times for 37 yards.
Who was the leading receiver?
Florida’s Dallas Wilson led the receiving statistics with six receptions for 111 yards and two touchdowns. Texas’ leading receiver was DeAndre Moore Jr., who had three catches for 75 yards.
How many sacks did Florida record?
Florida recorded six sacks against Texas. Texas recorded zero sacks against Florida.
How many interceptions were thrown?
Arch Manning threw two interceptions for Texas. DJ Lagway threw one interception for Florida.
What was the final score?
Florida defeated Texas 29-21. Florida led 19-7 at halftime and Texas scored seven points in the fourth quarter, but the Longhorns could not erase the deficit.
Conclusion
The Texas Longhorns Football vs Florida Gators Football Match Player Stats show that Florida’s 29-21 victory was built on balance rather than one isolated statistical advantage.
DJ Lagway delivered the more efficient passing performance, completing 21 of 28 attempts for 298 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception. Jadan Baugh added 107 rushing yards and a touchdown, while Dallas Wilson produced 111 receiving yards and two touchdowns.
Texas had its own standout performances. Arch Manning passed for 263 yards and two touchdowns, DeAndre Moore Jr. averaged 25 yards per catch, and Anthony Hill Jr. recorded 14 tackles.
The biggest difference, however, was the overall structure of the game. Florida rushed for 159 yards compared with 52 for Texas, recorded six sacks compared with zero, and intercepted Manning twice.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring adds another layer to the result. Florida established a 19-7 halftime lead, while Texas performed better after halftime. The Longhorns won the fourth quarter 7-0, but Florida’s early advantage proved decisive.
Ultimately, the numbers show a Florida team that was more balanced, more efficient through the air, more productive on the ground, and more disruptive defensively. Texas generated enough passing yardage and second-half scoring to remain competitive, but the combination of limited rushing production, turnovers, and defensive pressure kept the Longhorns from completing the comeback.
For anyone studying this matchup through the box score, the clearest lesson is that individual passing yardage does not tell the whole story. Florida’s advantage came from how its rushing, passing, defensive pressure, turnovers, and scoring efficiency worked together.
