Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats

The Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats from November 2, 2025, tell the story of one of the most unusual and tightly contested games of the season. Jacksonville defeated Las Vegas 30-29 in overtime, but the final score alone does not explain how the game developed. The Raiders produced the stronger passing performance, while Jacksonville generated more balance through its rushing attack and made the most of its opportunities in the kicking game. The result was a matchup where individual production and situational execution mattered more than simply controlling one statistical category.

Jacksonville entered the game at 4-3 and improved to 5-3 with the victory, including a 2-1 record on the road. Las Vegas fell to 2-6 overall and 1-3 at home. The one-point overtime margin shows how little separated the teams when the game reached its decisive stage.

Trevor Lawrence completed 23 of 34 passes for 220 yards, while Geno Smith completed 29 of 39 attempts for 284 yards and four touchdowns. That gives Smith a substantial statistical advantage through the air. Yet Jacksonville still found a way to score 30 points because its offense was more productive on the ground and kicker Cam Little delivered a perfect field-goal performance, including a 68-yard field goal.

On the other side, Brock Bowers was the standout receiving performer. He caught 12 passes for 127 yards and three touchdowns on 13 targets. His production was a major reason the Raiders remained competitive despite their limited rushing output.

This breakdown looks beyond the final score to explain what the individual numbers reveal about the game, where each team had an advantage, and why Jacksonville ultimately came away with the overtime victory.

Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The final score was:

Jacksonville Jaguars 30, Las Vegas Raiders 29, overtime

The most important point is that neither team dominated every phase. Instead, the game was shaped by contrasting strengths.

Jacksonville’s statistical profile was built around balance:

• 220 passing yards
• 151 rushing yards
• Three rushing touchdowns
• Three made field goals
• One interception on defense
• Two sacks
• 72 total tackles

Las Vegas relied much more heavily on its passing game:

• 284 passing yards
• Four passing touchdowns
• 57 rushing yards
• One sack
• One defensive interception
• 85 total tackles

The contrast is striking. Jacksonville ran for 94 more yards than Las Vegas, while the Raiders threw for 64 more yards than the Jaguars.

That creates an important lesson when evaluating NFL player statistics: the team with the best quarterback numbers does not necessarily win the game.

Geno Smith posted the better passing line by a wide margin. He completed 29 of 39 passes for 284 yards, averaging 7.3 yards per attempt, with four touchdowns and one interception. His passer rating was 117.9 and his QBR was 69.6.

Trevor Lawrence had a more modest statistical day. He completed 23 of 34 passes for 220 yards, averaging 6.5 yards per attempt. He did not throw a touchdown and was intercepted once. He also lost four yards on one sack. His passer rating was 73.2 with a QBR of 60.7.

If the comparison were based only on quarterback efficiency, Las Vegas would have a strong argument for winning the statistical battle.

But football is not decided by quarterback numbers alone.

Jacksonville compensated for the passing difference with a stronger ground game, reliable kicking, and enough defensive disruption to keep the Raiders from turning their passing advantage into a victory.

Trevor Lawrence Passing Performance

Trevor Lawrence’s numbers were not spectacular, but they were efficient enough in volume and completion percentage to keep Jacksonville’s offense functioning.

He finished with:

• 23 completions
• 34 attempts
• 220 yards
• 6.5 yards per attempt
• Zero touchdowns
• One interception
• One sack for four yards
• 73.2 passer rating
• 60.7 QBR

His completion rate was approximately 67.6 percent, calculated from 23 completions on 34 attempts.

The key issue was the lack of passing touchdowns.

Lawrence was unable to match Smith’s four touchdown passes, which meant Jacksonville needed other ways to finish drives. The rushing attack provided that answer, with the Jaguars recording three rushing touchdowns.

This is an important distinction when reading quarterback statistics. A quarterback can have a lower rating while still contributing to a winning offensive structure if the team is effective in other areas.

Lawrence also avoided a major negative in the sack department. He was sacked only once for four yards. His interception was the primary turnover concern in his passing line.

His performance therefore looks less like a game where the quarterback carried the offense and more like one where he operated within a balanced attack.

What Lawrence’s Numbers Suggest

The most useful takeaway is that Jacksonville did not need Lawrence to win the passing matchup.

The Jaguars were able to reduce their dependence on explosive passing by running the ball 42 times. That gave the offense another path to sustain possessions and score.

Lawrence’s 220 yards were enough to complement the rushing attack, even though they were not enough to compete directly with Smith’s 284 yards.

Geno Smith’s Four-Touchdown Performance

Geno Smith produced the most impressive quarterback statistical line in the game.

He completed 29 of 39 passes for 284 yards and four touchdowns. His 7.3 yards per attempt was also higher than Lawrence’s 6.5.

His final numbers were:

• 29 completions
• 39 attempts
• 284 yards
• 7.3 yards per attempt
• Four touchdowns
• One interception
• Two sacks for 10 yards
• 117.9 passer rating
• 69.6 QBR

His completion rate was approximately 74.4 percent.

A passer rating of 117.9 combined with four touchdown passes makes it clear that Smith was highly productive when the Raiders moved the ball through the air.

However, the passing success did not translate into enough overall offensive production to win.

The Raiders ran only 19 times for 57 yards. That limited rushing production placed even more responsibility on Smith and the passing attack.

When a team becomes heavily dependent on its quarterback, strong passing numbers can coexist with a narrow margin for error. That appears especially relevant in a one-point overtime game.

Smith’s one interception also mattered because turnovers can erase the value created by otherwise efficient offensive drives.

Brock Bowers Was the Raiders’ Offensive Standout

Brock Bowers delivered the most dominant individual receiving performance in the game.

He recorded:

• 12 receptions
• 127 receiving yards
• 10.6 yards per reception
• Three touchdowns
• 27-yard longest reception
• 13 targets

The 12 receptions were easily the most among the listed Raiders receivers, and his three touchdowns accounted for the majority of Smith’s touchdown passes.

His catch rate was approximately 92.3 percent, based on 12 receptions on 13 targets.

That is an extraordinary level of target conversion for a player handling such a large portion of the passing workload.

Bowers averaged 10.6 yards every time he caught the ball, meaning his production was not simply based on short receptions. He combined high volume with meaningful yardage and exceptional scoring production.

The 127 yards also represented nearly 45 percent of Smith’s passing yardage.

That makes Bowers central to understanding the Raiders’ offensive strategy.

Why Bowers Mattered So Much

The Raiders did not run the football effectively. Ashton Jeanty led the team with 13 carries for only 42 yards, an average of 3.2 yards per carry.

That made the passing game particularly important.

Bowers gave Smith a dependable high-volume target who could convert opportunities into both first-down yardage and touchdowns.

His 13 targets were the most listed for any Raiders receiver, and he turned those opportunities into 12 catches.

The numbers suggest a very clear offensive relationship: Smith created the passing production, while Bowers was the primary player converting that production into points.

Parker Washington Led Jacksonville’s Receiving Group

While the Raiders had the game’s most productive individual receiver, Jacksonville’s leading receiver was Parker Washington.

Washington finished with:

• 8 receptions
• 90 yards
• 11.3 yards per reception
• Zero touchdowns
• 22-yard longest reception
• Nine targets

He caught eight of nine targets, giving him a catch rate of approximately 88.9 percent.

Washington’s 90 yards represented a significant portion of Jacksonville’s passing production.

Unlike Bowers, however, Washington did not score a receiving touchdown. Jacksonville’s touchdowns came through its rushing attack rather than through the passing game.

That difference helps explain the overall offensive identity of the matchup.

Las Vegas generated touchdown production through the air.

Jacksonville generated touchdown production on the ground.

Travis Etienne Jr. and the Jaguars’ Ground Game

Travis Etienne Jr. was Jacksonville’s leading rusher with 22 carries for 84 yards.

His numbers included:

• 22 carries
• 84 yards
• 3.8 yards per carry
• Zero touchdowns
• 20-yard longest run

Etienne did not score, but his workload was significant.

Twenty-two carries represented more than half of Jacksonville’s 42 rushing attempts. He was therefore a major part of the Jaguars’ offensive plan.

The 20-yard longest run also indicates that his production was not limited entirely to short gains.

Jacksonville’s overall rushing attack produced 151 yards on 42 carries, averaging 3.6 yards per attempt and scoring three touchdowns.

That means Etienne’s individual performance was only part of the story. Other Jacksonville runners supplied the touchdown production that the passing game lacked.

This is one of the clearest examples of why team rushing statistics can sometimes be more revealing than a single player’s rushing line.

Etienne led the team in yardage and attempts, but the broader running game delivered the touchdowns.

Jacksonville’s Rushing Advantage

The Jaguars had a massive advantage in rushing volume.

Jacksonville:

42 carries, 151 yards, 3.6 average, three touchdowns

Las Vegas:

19 carries, 57 yards, 3.0 average, zero touchdowns

The difference was 94 rushing yards.

Jacksonville also had 23 more rushing attempts.

That matters for two reasons.

First, the Jaguars were able to create a more balanced offensive attack.

Second, their running game produced the touchdowns that Lawrence did not produce through the air.

The Jaguars did not need to win the quarterback comparison because they won the ground-game comparison decisively.

The three rushing touchdowns were particularly important. They represent direct scoring production that the Raiders did not receive from their rushing offense.

Ashton Jeanty’s Limited Rushing Output

Ashton Jeanty led the Raiders with 13 carries for 42 yards.

His 3.2 yards per carry was lower than Etienne’s 3.8 and lower than Jacksonville’s team average of 3.6.

His longest run was 13 yards.

The biggest problem for Las Vegas was not necessarily that Jeanty had a poor individual workload. Rather, the Raiders’ entire rushing attack struggled to generate consistent production.

Nineteen total carries for 57 yards gave Las Vegas very little ground-game support.

That imbalance forced Smith and the passing attack to carry a much larger portion of the offense.

Receiving Comparison: Volume Versus Scoring

The receiving statistics create another interesting contrast.

Jacksonville’s receiving group recorded:

• 23 receptions
• 220 yards
• 9.6 yards per reception
• Zero touchdowns
• 33 targets

Las Vegas recorded:

• 29 receptions
• 284 yards
• 9.8 yards per reception
• Four touchdowns
• 38 targets

The Raiders therefore led in receptions, receiving yards, yards per reception, targets, and receiving touchdowns.

This was not a marginal advantage.

The Raiders’ passing and receiving game was clearly the more productive aerial attack.

Yet Jacksonville still won.

That makes the game particularly useful for anyone studying player statistics because it demonstrates the danger of evaluating an NFL matchup through a single category.

The Raiders were better through the air.

The Jaguars were better on the ground.

The final result was decided by the combination of those phases, plus defense and kicking.

Defensive Player Statistics

The defensive numbers show another layer of the matchup.

Jacksonville recorded:

• 72 tackles
• 35 solo tackles
• Two sacks
• Five tackles for loss
• Five passes defended
• Four quarterback hits
• One interception

Las Vegas recorded:

• 85 tackles
• 57 solo tackles
• One sack
• Eight tackles for loss
• Four passes defended
• Two quarterback hits
• One interception

The Raiders had more tackles overall and more tackles for loss.

Jacksonville, however, generated twice as many sacks and twice as many quarterback hits.

That distinction matters.

Tackles can indicate defensive involvement, but quarterback hits and sacks provide a clearer picture of pressure applied to the passing game.

Jacksonville’s defense registered two sacks for a combined four yards against Lawrence’s own sack total? More precisely, the team defensive statistics show two sacks against the Raiders’ offense, while Lawrence was sacked once by Las Vegas.

That pressure helped Jacksonville disrupt Smith despite his excellent passing performance.

Foyesade Oluokun Led Jacksonville in Tackles

Foyesade Oluokun recorded 11 total tackles, including five solo tackles.

His 11 tackles led Jacksonville.

The number indicates that Oluokun was consistently involved in the defensive action, especially in a game where Las Vegas attempted 39 passes.

High tackle involvement can be especially important when an opponent generates a large number of completions.

Oluokun’s contribution was therefore part of the broader defensive effort that kept the Raiders from turning their passing success into a win.

Devin White Led the Raiders in Tackles

Devin White recorded 16 total tackles and eight solo tackles for Las Vegas.

His 16 total tackles were the highest tackle total among the listed players from either team.

That number reflects significant defensive involvement.

The Raiders’ defense finished with 85 total tackles, compared with 72 for Jacksonville.

White’s individual output accounted for a substantial share of that activity.

However, tackle volume must be interpreted alongside the overall result. Las Vegas recorded more tackles, but Jacksonville scored 30 points and won the game.

A high tackle total can indicate strong involvement without necessarily proving that a defense controlled the matchup.

Turnovers and Defensive Plays

Both teams recorded one interception.

Jacksonville’s Montaric Brown intercepted one pass.

Las Vegas’ Isaiah Pola-Mao also recorded one interception.

Neither interception produced return yards or a touchdown.

That makes the turnover battle even at one interception apiece.

Jacksonville also recorded one team fumble, but the fumble was recovered by Jacksonville and therefore did not become a lost possession.

Las Vegas recorded no fumbles.

So, based on the supplied statistics, neither team had a decisive advantage in lost turnovers.

This is important because it rules out a simple explanation that Jacksonville won solely because of turnover dominance.

The victory came from a broader combination of rushing production, scoring efficiency, defensive pressure, and kicking.

Cam Little’s Perfect Kicking Performance

Cam Little was one of the most important special-teams players in the game.

He made:

• 3 of 3 field goals
• 3 of 3 extra points
• Longest field goal: 68 yards
• 12 total points

The 68-yard field goal stands out immediately.

It was the longest successful field goal listed in the game and came from a distance that can dramatically change how an offense approaches a scoring opportunity.

Little’s perfect 3-for-3 field-goal record also eliminated missed-field-goal risk for Jacksonville.

He converted all three extra points as well.

His 12 points were a major part of Jacksonville’s 30-point total.

This is one of the clearest reasons why the final score cannot be understood simply by comparing Lawrence and Smith.

Smith threw four touchdown passes, but Little scored 12 points for Jacksonville through field goals and extra points.

Daniel Carlson’s Kicking Numbers

Daniel Carlson was also perfect on field goals, making his only attempt from 24 yards.

However, he converted only two of three extra-point attempts.

His final scoring total was five points.

The difference between the kickers was therefore significant.

Little scored 12 points.

Carlson scored five.

That creates a seven-point difference in kicking production.

In a game decided by one point in overtime, that difference is impossible to ignore.

While field-goal and extra-point production cannot explain every individual scoring sequence without the full play-by-play, the supplied statistics clearly show that Jacksonville received much more reliable scoring from its kicker.

Kick Return Comparison

Special teams also produced a measurable advantage for the Raiders.

Jacksonville recorded:

• Five kick returns
• 155 return yards
• 31.0 yards per return
• 54-yard longest return

Las Vegas recorded:

• Six kick returns
• 232 return yards
• 38.7 yards per return
• 54-yard longest return

Las Vegas therefore averaged 7.7 more yards per kick return.

The Raiders also gained 77 more total kick-return yards.

This is another area where Las Vegas had the statistical edge.

Yet again, that advantage did not translate into victory.

Parker Washington also recorded one punt return for four yards for Jacksonville. Las Vegas had no punt returns listed.

The special-teams picture therefore was mixed: Las Vegas was more productive on kick returns, while Jacksonville’s kicking unit was much more productive in scoring.

Punting Numbers

Jacksonville’s Logan Cooke punted twice for 73 yards, averaging 36.5 yards per punt.

His longest punt was 41 yards, and one punt was placed inside the 20-yard line.

Las Vegas’ AJ Cole punted once for 56 yards.

Cole averaged 56.0 yards per punt, with a longest punt of 56 yards and one punt inside the 20.

The Raiders therefore had the stronger raw punting average.

But there were only three combined punts in the supplied statistics, so this is not an area that should be overinterpreted.

The low punt volume itself suggests that the game featured sustained offensive possessions and scoring opportunities rather than repeated three-and-out exchanges.

The Most Important Statistical Mismatch

The most revealing mismatch was the contrast between passing and rushing.

Las Vegas passing:

284 yards

Jacksonville passing:

220 yards

Jacksonville rushing:

151 yards

Las Vegas rushing:

57 yards

This means Jacksonville generated 371 combined passing and rushing yards, while Las Vegas generated 341.

The Jaguars had 30 more total offensive yards based on the supplied passing and rushing figures.

That is a crucial observation.

The Raiders had the better quarterback performance and the better passing attack, but Jacksonville produced more total yards because of its rushing advantage.

The Jaguars’ 151 rushing yards more than compensated for their 64-yard passing deficit.

This is probably the single most useful statistical explanation for the outcome.

Why the Jaguars Won Despite the Raiders’ Passing Advantage

There are several reasons.

1. Jacksonville controlled the ground game

The Jaguars ran 42 times for 151 yards.

Las Vegas ran only 19 times for 57 yards.

That gave Jacksonville a much more balanced offensive profile.

2. Jacksonville scored three rushing touchdowns

Lawrence did not throw a touchdown pass, but Jacksonville still scored three rushing touchdowns.

That allowed the offense to finish drives without relying on passing touchdowns.

3. Cam Little was perfect

Little converted all three field-goal attempts and all three extra points.

His 12 points were a major contribution.

4. Jacksonville generated more quarterback pressure

The Jaguars recorded two sacks and four quarterback hits.

Las Vegas recorded one sack and two quarterback hits.

Smith had the better passing statistics, but Jacksonville still found ways to disrupt him.

5. The Jaguars produced more combined offensive yardage

Based on the supplied figures, Jacksonville generated 371 yards through passing and rushing, compared with 341 for Las Vegas.

6. The game was decided in overtime

The one-point final margin means the game was exceptionally close.

Neither team needed to dominate every statistical category to have a realistic chance of winning.

A Deeper Look at Efficiency

Raw totals are useful, but averages often provide a better understanding of how players performed.

Lawrence averaged 6.5 yards per passing attempt.

Smith averaged 7.3.

Etienne averaged 3.8 yards per carry.

Jeanty averaged 3.2.

Washington averaged 11.3 yards per reception.

Bowers averaged 10.6.

These numbers show three different forms of efficiency.

Smith was more efficient as a passer.

Etienne was more efficient as a leading runner.

Washington was slightly more explosive on a per-catch basis than Bowers.

But Bowers was far more productive in volume and scoring.

This distinction between efficiency and total impact is important.

A player can have a slightly better average while another player produces greater overall value because of workload.

Washington averaged 11.3 yards per catch, but Bowers caught 12 passes for 127 yards and scored three touchdowns.

The latter was clearly the more consequential receiving performance.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Offensive Identity

The numbers suggest two very different offensive identities.

Jacksonville operated as a balanced offense.

The Jaguars attempted 34 passes and ran 42 times.

Las Vegas attempted 39 passes and ran only 19 times.

That is a dramatic difference in offensive balance.

Jacksonville had eight more rushing attempts than passing attempts.

Las Vegas had 20 more passing attempts than rushing attempts.

This tells us a great deal about how each offense moved through the game.

Jacksonville was comfortable using the running game as a central component.

Las Vegas depended heavily on Smith’s arm and its receiving corps.

That dependency worked remarkably well in the passing game but left the Raiders with little rushing support.

What the Statistics Say About Brock Bowers

Bowers’ performance deserves special attention because it combined volume, efficiency, yardage, and touchdowns.

Twelve catches from 13 targets means he was targeted frequently and rarely failed to convert.

His 127 yards show that the receptions were productive.

His three touchdowns show that the production reached the most important part of the field.

A receiver can produce 100 yards without scoring and still have an excellent game. Bowers went beyond that by adding three touchdowns.

His performance was arguably the strongest individual offensive showing in the matchup.

Yet the Raiders still lost.

That is a valuable reminder that even an elite individual performance does not guarantee a team victory.

What the Statistics Say About Travis Etienne Jr.

Etienne’s performance was different from Bowers’ but equally important to Jacksonville’s overall approach.

He handled 22 carries and gained 84 yards.

His 3.8 average was solid rather than explosive.

But his workload helped Jacksonville maintain its commitment to the running game.

The fact that he did not score should not obscure his importance.

Jacksonville’s three rushing touchdowns came from the team as a whole.

Etienne’s role was to provide volume and yardage, while the broader rushing attack supplied the finishing production.

This is why looking only at touchdowns can sometimes undervalue a running back’s contribution.

The Defensive Story

The defensive comparison is more nuanced than the raw tackle totals suggest.

Las Vegas recorded 85 tackles compared with Jacksonville’s 72.

The Raiders also recorded eight tackles for loss compared with five for Jacksonville.

But Jacksonville had two sacks to Las Vegas’ one and four quarterback hits to the Raiders’ two.

Jacksonville also defended five passes, while Las Vegas defended four.

The statistics therefore do not point to complete defensive dominance by either team.

Instead, they show different forms of defensive activity.

Las Vegas recorded more overall tackles and tackles for loss.

Jacksonville produced more sacks, quarterback hits, and passes defended.

That balance fits the final score.

Neither defense completely shut down the opponent.

Understanding the One-Point Overtime Margin

A 30-29 overtime result should immediately encourage caution when drawing broad conclusions.

The difference between winning and losing was only one point.

That means small plays, successful kicks, turnovers, defensive stops, and individual execution can have an outsized impact on the result.

The statistical profile supports that interpretation.

Las Vegas had:

• The better passing performance
• More receiving production
• More tackles
• More tackles for loss
• More kick-return yardage
• The better punting average

Jacksonville had:

• More rushing yards
• More rushing touchdowns
• More total offensive yards
• More sacks
• More quarterback hits
• Better field-goal production
• Better extra-point consistency

This is exactly the type of matchup where a simple “who had better stats?” question has no single answer.

The answer depends on which phase is being measured.

Player Stats That Matter Most

If the goal is to identify the most important individual performances, several players stand out.

Brock Bowers

Bowers was the leading offensive playmaker for Las Vegas with 12 catches, 127 yards, and three touchdowns.

Geno Smith

Smith produced the game’s best quarterback statistics with 284 yards and four touchdown passes.

Cam Little

Little delivered 12 points while making every field-goal and extra-point attempt.

Travis Etienne Jr.

Etienne supplied Jacksonville with 84 rushing yards on 22 carries and helped establish the team’s ground-game advantage.

Parker Washington

Washington led Jacksonville’s receivers with eight catches for 90 yards.

Foyesade Oluokun

Oluokun led Jacksonville with 11 tackles.

Devin White

White led all listed players in tackles with 16.

These players illustrate why the final result was a team victory rather than a simple quarterback-driven outcome.

How to Read These Stats Without Misleading Conclusions

A common mistake in sports analysis is to take one statistic and use it as the explanation for the entire game.

For example, saying “Geno Smith played better, so Las Vegas should have won” ignores the rushing and kicking numbers.

Likewise, saying “Jacksonville had more rushing yards, so it controlled everything” would ignore Bowers’ receiving production and Smith’s four touchdowns.

A better approach is to organize the numbers into categories.

Passing

Las Vegas had the clear advantage.

Rushing

Jacksonville had the clear advantage.

Receiving

Las Vegas had the clear advantage.

Defensive pressure

Jacksonville had the edge in sacks and quarterback hits.

Tackling

Las Vegas had the higher totals.

Kicking

Jacksonville had the stronger performance.

Kick returns

Las Vegas had the stronger numbers.

Turnovers

The interception count was even, with one apiece.

This framework gives a much more accurate picture than focusing only on the final score.

Jacksonville’s 5-3 Record After the Victory

The victory moved Jacksonville to 5-3 overall and 2-1 away.

That is meaningful context for the game.

The Jaguars were not simply winning at home against a struggling opponent. They were able to secure a road victory in a one-point overtime contest.

Las Vegas fell to 2-6 overall and 1-3 at home.

Those records provide context, but they should not be used to erase what happened statistically in this particular matchup.

The Raiders were highly effective through the air.

The Jaguars were more balanced.

The game ultimately rewarded Jacksonville’s ability to generate production across multiple phases.

What Fans and Analysts Should Take From the Matchup

The most important lesson is that NFL games are multi-dimensional.

The quarterback with four touchdown passes did not win.

The team with the leading receiver did not win.

The team with more tackles did not win.

The team with more kick-return yardage did not win.

Instead, Jacksonville won by putting together enough advantages across rushing, scoring efficiency, defensive pressure, and special teams.

That makes this matchup particularly interesting from a statistical perspective.

It demonstrates why a box score should be read as a collection of connected indicators rather than a ranking of individual numbers.

Quick Statistical Summary

Here is the core comparison in a simplified format:

Category	Jacksonville Jaguars	Las Vegas Raiders
Final Score	30	29
Passing Yards	220	284
Rushing Yards	151	57
Passing TDs	0	4
Rushing TDs	3	0
Total Pass Attempts	34	39
Total Rush Attempts	42	19
Leading Passer	Trevor Lawrence	Geno Smith
Leading Rusher	Travis Etienne Jr.	Ashton Jeanty
Leading Receiver	Parker Washington	Brock Bowers
Defensive Sacks	2	1
Interceptions	1	1
Field Goals Made	3	1
Extra Points Made	3	2
Tackles	72	85
Kick Return Yards	155	232

The table reinforces the central theme: Las Vegas dominated several passing and defensive volume categories, while Jacksonville created enough advantages elsewhere to win.

Final Assessment of the Match Player Statistics

The Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats present a fascinating contrast between individual passing brilliance and team-wide balance.

Geno Smith was the more productive passer. His 284 yards, four touchdowns, 117.9 passer rating, and 69.6 QBR make that unmistakable.

Brock Bowers was the Raiders’ most productive receiver, catching 12 of 13 targets for 127 yards and three touchdowns.

On Jacksonville’s side, Trevor Lawrence produced 220 passing yards without a touchdown, but the Jaguars did not need him to win the passing battle.

Travis Etienne Jr. helped lead a rushing attack that generated 151 yards.

Jacksonville also received 12 points from Cam Little, including a perfect 3-for-3 field-goal performance and a remarkable 68-yard make.

Defensively, the Jaguars produced more sacks and quarterback hits, while Las Vegas recorded more total tackles and tackles for loss.

The final result was therefore not the product of one overwhelming statistical category.

It was the result of complementary production.

Jacksonville’s rushing game supported its passing attack. Its kicker converted every opportunity listed. Its defense generated enough pressure to disrupt an otherwise highly effective quarterback. And the team managed to produce 30 points despite Lawrence throwing no touchdowns.

Las Vegas, meanwhile, demonstrated how dangerous its passing game could be. Smith and Bowers created a highly productive connection, but the Raiders could not generate enough rushing support or kicking production to turn that offensive efficiency into a win.

For anyone studying NFL box scores, this game is a useful reminder that the most important statistic is often not the most impressive individual number.

The Raiders had the more eye-catching quarterback and receiving numbers.

The Jaguars had the more complete statistical formula.

That difference ultimately separated a 5-3 road team from a 2-6 home team after an overtime thriller that finished 30-29.

FAQs

Who was the best player in the Jaguars vs Raiders game?

Brock Bowers had one of the strongest individual performances, recording 12 receptions for 127 yards and three touchdowns. Geno Smith also produced an outstanding game with 284 passing yards and four touchdowns.

How many passing yards did Trevor Lawrence have?

Trevor Lawrence completed 23 of 34 passes for 220 yards. He averaged 6.5 yards per attempt, threw one interception, and did not record a passing touchdown.

How many touchdowns did Geno Smith throw?

Geno Smith threw four touchdown passes against Jacksonville. He completed 29 of 39 attempts for 284 yards and finished with a 117.9 passer rating.

Who led the Jaguars in rushing?

Travis Etienne Jr. led Jacksonville with 22 carries for 84 yards. His longest run was 20 yards, and he averaged 3.8 yards per carry.

Who led the Raiders in receiving?

Brock Bowers led the Raiders with 12 receptions for 127 yards and three touchdowns. He was targeted 13 times and averaged 10.6 yards per reception.

Who won the Jaguars vs Raiders game?

The Jacksonville Jaguars defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 30-29 in overtime on November 2, 2025. Jacksonville improved to 5-3, while Las Vegas fell to 2-6.

Conclusion

The Jacksonville Jaguars vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats show why a close NFL game cannot be understood by looking at one player or one statistical category.

Las Vegas had the stronger passing attack, led by Geno Smith and Brock Bowers. Smith threw four touchdowns, while Bowers caught three of them and finished with 127 receiving yards.

Jacksonville answered with balance. The Jaguars rushed for 151 yards, scored three rushing touchdowns, generated more total offensive yards from passing and rushing, and received a perfect kicking performance from Cam Little.

The defensive numbers were similarly mixed. Las Vegas recorded more tackles and tackles for loss, but Jacksonville produced more sacks and quarterback hits. Both defenses intercepted one pass.

Ultimately, the numbers explain the one-point overtime result better than any single headline statistic. Las Vegas excelled through the air, while Jacksonville found more ways to contribute across the entire game.

For readers comparing player performances, the most useful approach is therefore to examine passing efficiency, rushing volume, receiving production, defensive pressure, turnovers, and special teams together. That broader view reveals how Jacksonville turned a less impressive quarterback stat line into a 30-29 road victory.