New England Patriots vs New York Jets Match Player Stats
The new england patriots vs new york jets match player stats from the 2025 meeting tell a much more detailed story than the 27-14 final score alone. New England overcame a quick Jets start, controlled the middle portion of the game, and finished strongly behind an efficient passing performance from Drake Maye and a three-touchdown outing from TreVeyon Henderson. New York, meanwhile, moved the ball effectively on the ground but could not generate enough consistent passing production to keep pace.
One important date correction is worth making before examining the numbers. The game was played on Thursday, November 13, 2025, at Gillette Stadium, not November 14. The Patriots entered at 8-2 and moved to 9-2 with the victory, while the Jets fell to 2-8. The official box score records the final as New England 27, New York 14. Pro Football Reference game box score
This breakdown focuses on the player-level numbers that actually explain the result. Rather than simply listing passing, rushing, and receiving totals, the goal is to show how those performances connected to field position, scoring efficiency, possession, and the changing momentum of the game.
New england patriots vs new york jets match player stats: Game Overview
The Patriots won 27-14 after trailing 7-0 in the first quarter. New York scored first on a five-yard touchdown run by Justin Fields, but New England answered with 14 points in the second quarter and never surrendered the lead again.
The scoring pattern was important:
| Quarter | New York Jets | New England Patriots |
| 1st | 7 | 0 |
| 2nd | 0 | 14 |
| 3rd | 7 | 7 |
| 4th | 0 | 6 |
| Final | 14 | 27 |
The Patriots did not dominate every statistical category. In fact, New York had the clear advantage in rushing yardage.
The difference came through several complementary areas:
- New England produced 336 total yards compared with 245 for New York.
- The Patriots generated 23 first downs while the Jets produced 15.
- Drake Maye threw for 281 gross passing yards.
- Justin Fields threw for 116 gross yards and added 67 rushing yards.
- New York averaged 5.0 yards per rushing attempt.
- New England averaged only 2.4 yards per rushing attempt.
- The Patriots converted their opportunities into three offensive touchdowns.
- New York committed the game’s only lost fumble.
- New England controlled possession for 31:56 compared with 28:04.
That combination illustrates an important lesson in football analysis: winning the rushing-yardage battle does not automatically mean winning the game.
Drake Maye’s Passing Performance
Drake Maye was one of the most important players in the game because New England’s offense was built around his ability to attack the Jets through the air.
Maye completed 25 of 34 passes for 281 yards, with one touchdown and no interceptions. His official passer rating was 107.6, while his ESPN QBR was 83.7.
His completion percentage was:
25 ÷ 34 = 73.5%
That is a strong completion rate, especially considering the Patriots were not simply using short throws to manufacture a high percentage.
Maye averaged 8.3 yards per attempt on his gross passing total. That figure is especially revealing when compared with the Jets.
Justin Fields averaged only 4.5 yards per attempt on his 26 attempts.
The contrast shows why the Patriots were able to create more passing value even though both quarterbacks avoided interceptions.
Maye’s Efficiency Was More Important Than Volume
Maye did not need an enormous number of attempts to control the game.
He attempted 34 passes and completed 25. Those completions generated enough explosive value to keep New England moving even while the Patriots struggled to establish a traditional rushing attack.
His passing line:
| Statistic | Drake Maye |
| Completions | 25 |
| Attempts | 34 |
| Completion rate | 73.5% |
| Gross passing yards | 281 |
| Passing TDs | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Yards per attempt | 8.3 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack yards lost | 10 |
| Passer rating | 107.6 |
| QBR | 83.7 |
The absence of an interception was also significant.
New York did not record an interception, which meant the Jets had to create defensive stops without receiving the kind of short-field opportunity that can dramatically change an NFL game.
Justin Fields’ Dual-Threat Production
Justin Fields produced the most notable rushing performance among the quarterbacks.
He completed 15 of 26 passes for 116 yards, throwing one touchdown and no interceptions. He also rushed 11 times for 67 yards and one touchdown.
His rushing average was 6.1 yards per carry, which was considerably better than the Patriots’ team rushing average.
Fields’ complete offensive line looked like this:
| Category | Justin Fields |
| Pass completions | 15 |
| Pass attempts | 26 |
| Passing yards | 116 |
| Passing TD | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Passer rating | 81.6 |
| QBR | 61.9 |
| Rush attempts | 11 |
| Rushing yards | 67 |
| Rushing average | 6.1 |
| Rushing TD | 1 |
That gives Fields 183 combined passing and rushing yards before accounting for sack yardage.
He also scored the Jets’ opening touchdown with his five-yard rushing play.
Where Fields’ Performance Fell Short
The problem was not that Fields played poorly in every phase.
He actually gave New York several positive plays.
The problem was consistency.
His 116 passing yards were less than half of Maye’s 281 gross yards. The Jets also lost 11 yards on two sacks. That reduced their effective passing production and contributed to the difference in total offensive output.
Fields also lost a fumble. That turnover became particularly costly because the Patriots were able to turn the mistake into points later in the game.
The Jets needed Fields’ athletic ability to create explosive plays, but New England’s defense eventually limited the offense’s ability to sustain drives.
TreVeyon Henderson Was the Game’s Defining Player
If one player best explains the final result, it is TreVeyon Henderson.
Henderson scored three touchdowns, including two rushing touchdowns and one receiving touchdown.
He carried the ball 19 times for 62 yards and two touchdowns. He also caught five passes for 31 yards and a touchdown.
That gives him:
93 yards from scrimmage and three touchdowns.
His individual rushing line:
| Statistic | TreVeyon Henderson |
| Carries | 19 |
| Rushing yards | 62 |
| Rushing average | 3.3 |
| Rushing TDs | 2 |
| Long rush | 9 yards |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving yards | 31 |
| Receiving TDs | 1 |
| Total yards from scrimmage | 93 |
| Total TDs | 3 |
The three touchdowns were particularly valuable because New England’s rushing efficiency was not impressive.
This is one of the most interesting elements of the game.
The Patriots rushed for only 65 yards on 27 attempts, yet Henderson still scored twice on the ground. The offense therefore compensated for modest rushing efficiency by converting its scoring opportunities.
Henderson’s Touchdown Impact
His first two touchdowns came in the second quarter.
New England entered the quarter trailing 7-0. Henderson then scored twice on seven-yard rushing plays, turning the game around.
His third touchdown came in the third quarter when Maye found him for a six-yard receiving score.
That gave the Patriots a 21-7 advantage.
From a game-flow perspective, Henderson did not merely accumulate statistics. His production arrived at moments when the Patriots needed to change the direction of the game.
Stefon Diggs Led the Patriots in Receiving
Stefon Diggs was the Patriots’ leading receiver with nine receptions for 105 yards.
His average was:
105 ÷ 9 = 11.7 yards per reception
That is a strong combination of volume and efficiency.
Diggs accounted for more than one-third of Maye’s completions and was one of the clearest reasons New England was able to sustain its passing attack.
His line:
| Statistic | Stefon Diggs |
| Receptions | 9 |
| Receiving yards | 105 |
| Yards per reception | 11.7 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
The absence of a touchdown does not make his performance less important.
Touchdowns are only one part of receiving value. Diggs repeatedly helped the Patriots move the chains and maintain offensive rhythm.
Other Patriots Receiving Contributions
New England’s passing production was not dependent on one receiver.
Mack Hollins caught four passes for 64 yards.
Hunter Henry added four receptions for 45 yards.
DeMario Douglas caught three passes for 36 yards.
Henderson contributed another five receptions for 31 yards and a touchdown.
The distribution demonstrates why New York could not simply focus on one receiving target.
Patriots Receiving Summary
| Player | Receptions | Yards | TD |
| Stefon Diggs | 9 | 105 | 0 |
| Mack Hollins | 4 | 64 | 0 |
| Hunter Henry | 4 | 45 | 0 |
| DeMario Douglas | 3 | 36 | 0 |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 5 | 31 | 1 |
| Team total | 25 | 281 gross passing yards | 1 |
The Patriots’ 25 completions also matched their ability to sustain drives.
They finished with 23 first downs, including 16 through the passing game.
That is a major contrast with New York’s 15 first downs.
John Metchie III Provided New York’s Biggest Receiving Moment
John Metchie III was the Jets’ leading receiver in the game.
He caught three passes for 45 yards and one touchdown.
His touchdown was a 22-yard reception from Fields in the third quarter.
That score cut New England’s advantage to 21-14.
Metchie’s production was limited in volume, but his touchdown was extremely important because it temporarily reopened the game.
His line:
| Statistic | John Metchie III |
| Receptions | 3 |
| Yards | 45 |
| Average | 15.0 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long reception | 22 yards |
The Jets also received useful contributions from Mason Taylor and Jeremy Ruckert.
Taylor caught four passes for 30 yards.
Ruckert also caught four passes, producing 23 yards.
Adonai Mitchell added one reception for 10 yards.
Breece Hall caught two passes for six yards.
The issue was not a complete absence of receiving production. It was the lack of enough high-value passing plays to match New England’s output.
Breece Hall’s Rushing Performance
Breece Hall carried the ball 14 times for 58 yards, averaging 4.1 yards per carry.
He did not score a rushing touchdown.
Hall’s performance was productive enough to keep the Jets’ running game functional, but New York relied heavily on the combination of Hall and Fields.
Together, they produced:
- Hall: 58 rushing yards
- Fields: 67 rushing yards
- Isaiah Davis: 11 rushing yards
- Isaiah Williams: 4 rushing yards
The Jets finished with 140 rushing yards on 28 attempts, an excellent 5.0 yards per carry.
That was one of the clearest statistical advantages New York had.
Yet it did not translate into enough points.
Why the Jets’ 140 Rushing Yards Were Not Enough
This is perhaps the most useful analytical lesson from the game.
New York averaged 5.0 yards per rush.
New England averaged only 2.4 yards per rush.
On the surface, that appears to favor the Jets strongly.
But the Patriots won 27-14.
Why?
Because total offensive success is not determined by rushing efficiency alone.
New England gained 271 net passing yards compared with 105 for New York.
That created a net passing advantage of:
271 – 105 = 166 yards
New York’s rushing advantage was:
140 – 65 = 75 yards
The Patriots’ passing advantage was therefore more than twice the Jets’ rushing advantage.
The result was a 91-yard overall offensive advantage for New England:
336 total yards – 245 total yards = 91 yards
This is why the passing game was central to the outcome.
Team Offensive Comparison
| Category | Jets | Patriots |
| Total yards | 245 | 336 |
| Passing yards | 105 net | 271 net |
| Gross passing yards | 116 | 281 |
| Rushing yards | 140 | 65 |
| Rushing attempts | 28 | 27 |
| Yards per rush | 5.0 | 2.4 |
| First downs | 15 | 23 |
| Total plays | 57 | 62 |
| Time of possession | 28:04 | 31:56 |
| Turnovers lost | 1 | 0 |
| Third-down rate | 57% | 50% |
| Fourth-down rate | 0% | 100% |
The table reveals a fascinating split.
New York was better on the ground and converted third downs at a higher rate.
New England was better through the air, produced more first downs, ran more plays, controlled possession, and avoided turnovers.
Those advantages outweighed the Jets’ rushing superiority.
The Turnover Battle Favored New England
The Patriots did not throw an interception and did not lose a fumble.
The Jets also avoided interceptions, but Justin Fields lost one fumble.
That produced a 1-0 turnover advantage for New England.
One turnover may appear small, but in a game decided by 13 points, every additional possession matters.
New England’s defense also recovered a fumble through Anfernee Jennings.
The Jets’ inability to protect the ball gave the Patriots another opportunity to control the game.
Defensive Player Stats
The offensive numbers receive most of the attention, but several defensive players had notable performances.
For New York, Quincy Williams led the team with eight total tackles, including six solo tackles.
For New England, Robert Spillane recorded nine total tackles, including five solo tackles.
The Patriots also recorded sacks from Elijah Ponder and Christian Barmore.
Jay Tufele recorded a sack for the Jets.
Defensive Leaders
| Player | Team | Key statistic |
| Robert Spillane | Patriots | 9 tackles |
| Quincy Williams | Jets | 8 tackles |
| Christian Barmore | Patriots | 1 sack |
| Elijah Ponder | Patriots | 1 sack |
| Jay Tufele | Jets | 1 sack |
Neither defense recorded an interception.
That makes the Patriots’ ability to win without creating an interception especially notable.
Their defensive success came from pressure, limiting passing efficiency, creating the fumble opportunity, and forcing the Jets to play from behind after halftime.
Special Teams and Kicking Stats
Andy Borregales was another important contributor for New England.
He made 2 of 3 field-goal attempts, with a long of 44 yards, and converted all three extra-point attempts.
His nine points were a significant part of the final margin.
Nick Folk made both extra points for New York but did not attempt a field goal.
Kicking Comparison
| Statistic | Nick Folk | Andy Borregales |
| Field goals | 0/0 | 2/3 |
| Extra points | 2/2 | 3/3 |
| Total points | 2 | 9 |
| Long FG | N/A | 44 yards |
Borregales scored nine points, while the Jets’ kicking game contributed only two.
That difference mattered because New England’s fourth-quarter scoring came entirely through field goals.
Punting and Return Production
New York punter Austin McNamara recorded five punts for 227 yards, averaging 45.4 yards per punt.
His longest punt traveled 64 yards.
He placed two punts inside the 20-yard line.
New England’s Bryce Baringer punted three times for 153 yards, averaging 51.0 yards.
His longest punt was 56 yards, and two punts landed inside the 20.
New York also had four kickoff returns for 95 yards.
Kene Nwangwu handled three of those returns for 71 yards.
The Patriots recorded three kickoff returns for 68 yards, led by Efton Chism III.
Special teams did not decide the game by themselves, but New England’s field-goal production gave the Patriots an important finishing advantage.
The Second Quarter Changed the Game
The opening quarter belonged to New York.
The Jets drove 72 yards and finished the possession with Fields’ five-yard rushing touchdown.
New England responded differently.
Instead of forcing an immediate big play, the Patriots gradually built control.
Henderson scored twice in the second quarter.
Those two touchdowns changed the scoreboard from:
Jets 7, Patriots 0
to:
Patriots 14, Jets 7
That seven-point swing became the foundation of the victory.
The Patriots then added Henderson’s receiving touchdown in the third quarter.
New York answered with Metchie’s 22-yard touchdown reception, but the Jets could not score again.
Fourth Quarter Execution
The fourth quarter was a test of whether New York could mount a comeback.
It did not happen.
Borregales made a 44-yard field goal to push New England’s lead to 24-14.
Later, he added a 26-yard field goal.
The final score became 27-14.
That fourth-quarter sequence is important because the Patriots did not need another offensive touchdown to win.
They protected their advantage, used field position, and converted scoring opportunities into points.
New York, meanwhile, was held scoreless in the final quarter.
Time of Possession and Offensive Rhythm
New England held the ball for 31:56.
New York had possession for 28:04.
The difference was only 3:52, but it fits the broader offensive picture.
The Patriots ran 62 total plays.
The Jets ran 57.
That five-play difference is modest, but combined with the Patriots’ greater passing efficiency, it helped New England create more sustained offensive production.
New England also produced eight more first downs.
That is a stronger indicator of drive consistency than raw possession time alone.
Third-Down and Fourth-Down Performance
The Jets converted 8 of 14 third downs, a strong 57% rate.
The Patriots converted 6 of 12, or 50%.
So New York actually had the better third-down conversion percentage.
But the Patriots were perfect on fourth down, converting 1 of 1.
The Jets went 0 of 1 on fourth down.
This demonstrates why individual efficiency categories should not be viewed in isolation.
The Jets had the better third-down rate.
The Patriots had the better fourth-down result.
More importantly, New England combined its situational execution with superior passing production and a turnover advantage.
The Most Important Statistical Takeaways
Several numbers stand out when evaluating the complete performance.
1. The 91-Yard Total Offense Advantage
New England gained 336 yards.
New York gained 245.
That produced a 91-yard difference.
2. The Patriots Won Through the Air
The Patriots produced 271 net passing yards.
The Jets produced 105.
The 166-yard net passing advantage was arguably the biggest statistical reason for the victory.
3. The Jets Won the Rushing Battle
New York rushed for 140 yards.
New England rushed for 65.
But the Patriots did a better job converting their offensive opportunities into touchdowns.
4. Henderson Produced Three Touchdowns
His 93 yards from scrimmage were useful, but the three touchdowns were the defining part of his performance.
5. Maye Was Efficient
His 25 completions on 34 attempts produced 281 gross passing yards with one touchdown and no interceptions.
6. Fields Produced 183 Passing and Rushing Yards
His combination of 116 passing yards and 67 rushing yards showed his dual-threat ability.
But the Jets needed more passing efficiency.
7. New England Won the Turnover Battle
The Patriots lost zero turnovers.
The Jets lost one fumble.
8. The Patriots Finished Strongly
New York scored seven points in the first quarter and seven in the third.
It scored nothing in the second or fourth quarters.
New England scored in every quarter except the first.
What These Player Stats Say About the Patriots
The most useful conclusion is that New England did not win because it was superior in every statistical category.
It won because its strengths were more valuable in the specific game environment.
The Patriots had:
- A more efficient passing attack
- More first downs
- More total offensive yards
- Better scoring conversion
- No turnovers
- Three touchdowns from Henderson
- A reliable performance from Maye
- Nine points from Borregales
The rushing game was inefficient, but the passing game compensated.
That balance is what made the Patriots difficult to stop.
What These Numbers Say About the Jets
New York’s statistics show a team that had legitimate offensive tools but struggled to turn those tools into sustained scoring.
The Jets rushed for 140 yards.
Fields averaged 6.1 yards per carry.
Hall averaged 4.1.
The team averaged 5.0 yards per rush.
Those are encouraging numbers.
But the passing attack produced only 105 net yards.
That imbalance allowed New England to gradually control the game.
The Jets also needed to eliminate negative plays and protect the football.
The lost fumble became another obstacle.
A Practical Way to Read NFL Player Stats
For readers who want to understand football box scores more effectively, this game provides a useful framework.
Do not begin with touchdowns alone.
Start with:
- Total yards
- Net passing yards
- Rushing efficiency
- First downs
- Turnovers
- Third and fourth-down performance
- Time of possession
- Individual scoring contributions
- Explosive plays
- Game situation
Then ask how those numbers interact.
For example, New York’s 5.0 yards per rush looks excellent.
But once the 166-yard net passing deficit is considered, the overall offensive picture changes dramatically.
Likewise, Henderson’s 3.3 yards per carry appears ordinary.
Yet his three touchdowns make his performance highly valuable.
This is why raw averages should always be placed in game context.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Patriots and Jets?
The New England Patriots defeated the New York Jets 27-14 on November 13, 2025, at Gillette Stadium.
Who was the Patriots’ best player?
TreVeyon Henderson was the game’s standout scorer. He rushed for 62 yards and two touchdowns and added 31 receiving yards and another touchdown, finishing with three total touchdowns.
How did Drake Maye perform against the Jets?
Drake Maye completed 25 of 34 passes for 281 gross yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. He finished with a 107.6 passer rating and an 83.7 QBR.
How did Justin Fields perform?
Justin Fields completed 15 of 26 passes for 116 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. He also rushed for 67 yards and a touchdown on 11 attempts.
Which team had more rushing yards?
The Jets had substantially more rushing production. New York finished with 140 rushing yards on 28 attempts, compared with 65 yards on 27 attempts for New England.
Why did the Patriots win despite rushing for fewer yards?
New England made up for its weaker rushing performance with a major passing advantage. The Patriots produced 271 net passing yards compared with 105 for the Jets, gained more first downs, avoided turnovers, and converted their scoring opportunities more effectively.
Conclusion
The new england patriots vs new york jets match player stats show a game decided by efficiency and situational execution rather than by one simple statistical category.
New York’s rushing attack was the stronger ground unit. The Jets averaged 5.0 yards per carry and received 67 rushing yards from Fields and 58 from Hall. That production gave New York a legitimate offensive foundation.
The Patriots, however, controlled the game through the passing attack.
Maye completed 25 of 34 passes for 281 gross yards, while Diggs led the receiving corps with 105 yards. Henderson supplied the decisive scoring punch with three touchdowns. New England also avoided turnovers, produced 23 first downs, controlled possession for nearly 32 minutes, and finished with a 336-245 advantage in total yards.
The final 27-14 score therefore makes sense when the individual performances are viewed together.
The Jets had enough rushing success to compete, but their passing production was too limited. The Patriots did not run the ball efficiently, but their passing game and red-zone execution more than compensated.
For anyone studying the new england patriots vs new york jets match player stats, the biggest lesson is that box-score analysis works best when individual numbers are connected to game flow. Maye’s efficiency, Fields’ dual-threat ability, Henderson’s touchdown production, Diggs’ receiving volume, New York’s rushing advantage, and the turnover difference all contributed to the same underlying story.
New England did not need to dominate every category. It simply dominated the categories that mattered most for turning possessions into points.
