Lakers vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The lakers vs dallas mavericks match player stats from January 25, 2026, tell a much more interesting story than the final 116-110 score alone. Los Angeles built a strong early advantage, Dallas responded with a dominant third quarter, and the Lakers then produced a decisive fourth-quarter comeback to leave the American Airlines Center with the win. Luka Doncic led Los Angeles with 33 points and 11 assists, while Deandre Ayton led the Lakers with 11 rebounds. For Dallas, Naji Marshall finished with 21 points and 11 rebounds, while Cooper Flagg led the Mavericks with 6 assists.
The game was particularly notable because the Mavericks erased a 13-point halftime deficit and eventually moved ahead by 15 points in the fourth quarter before Los Angeles completely changed the momentum. The Lakers finished with better overall shooting, more rebounds, more assists and fewer second-chance opportunities allowed. The official NBA game record confirms the 116-110 result, the quarter-by-quarter scoring and the major individual performances. NBA official game box score
Lakers vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Lakers entered the matchup with a 27-17 record and a 15-9 road record. Dallas entered at 19-27 overall and 14-12 at home. That difference in season record was reflected in the final result, but the actual game was much closer and more volatile than those records might suggest.
Los Angeles won 116-110, improving its record while handing Dallas a setback after the Mavericks had built a four-game winning streak.
The game was played at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas, in front of 19,880 spectators. The officials were Josh Tiven, Rodney Mott and Matt Myers.
The quarter scores were:
| Quarter | Lakers | Mavericks |
| 1st | 37 | 28 |
| 2nd | 28 | 24 |
| 3rd | 14 | 35 |
| 4th | 37 | 23 |
| Final | 116 | 110 |
The numbers show how dramatically the game changed from one half to the next.
Los Angeles scored 65 points in the first half and held Dallas to 52. The Mavericks then responded with 35 points in the third quarter while limiting the Lakers to only 14. That 21-point swing completely transformed the game.
Yet the Lakers did not collapse. They recovered in the final period, scoring 37 points while Dallas managed only 23.
That fourth-quarter response is one of the most important parts of the matchup when studying the player statistics.
Luka Doncic Was the Central Offensive Force
Luka Doncic was the most influential individual player in the game.
He finished with:
| Statistic | Luka Doncic |
| Points | 33 |
| Rebounds | 8 |
| Assists | 11 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Field Goals | 8-15 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 53.3% |
| Three-Pointers | 3-8 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 37.5% |
| Free Throws | 14-15 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 93.3% |
| Turnovers | 5 |
| Fouls | 2 |
| Plus/Minus | +18 |
Doncic’s 33 points made him the game’s leading scorer. More importantly, his 11 assists show that his influence went well beyond scoring.
He created offense throughout the game and remained involved when Dallas made its third-quarter push. His ability to generate shots for himself while also creating opportunities for teammates gave Los Angeles an offensive anchor when the game became difficult.
His shooting profile is also worth examining.
Doncic made 8 of 15 field-goal attempts, good for 53.3 percent. He also converted 3 of 8 attempts from three-point range. The most striking number was his free-throw shooting. He made 14 of 15 attempts from the line.
That combination produced an efficient 33-point performance without requiring a huge number of field-goal attempts.
The five turnovers are the main negative statistic in his line. However, considering that he also recorded 11 assists and played a major role in the fourth-quarter comeback, his overall offensive contribution remained extremely valuable.
His +18 plus/minus was another strong indicator of his overall impact.
LeBron James Delivered When the Lakers Needed Him
LeBron James finished with 17 points, 8 rebounds and 5 assists.
His complete line included:
| Statistic | LeBron James |
| Points | 17 |
| Rebounds | 8 |
| Assists | 5 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Field Goals | 8-16 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 50.0% |
| Three-Pointers | 1-3 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 33.3% |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Fouls | 2 |
On the surface, 17 points may not look spectacular compared with Doncic’s 33. The context is more important.
James scored 11 of his 17 points in the fourth quarter, helping Los Angeles recover from a 15-point deficit.
That is a strong example of why raw scoring totals should not be used alone to judge a player’s impact.
A player can have a lower overall scoring total but still make the most important offensive contribution during the decisive part of a game.
James also contributed eight rebounds and five assists, giving the Lakers additional playmaking and rebounding support alongside Doncic.
Deandre Ayton Controlled the Rebounding Battle
Deandre Ayton was the Lakers’ leading rebounder with 11 boards.
His performance included:
| Statistic | Deandre Ayton |
| Points | 9 |
| Rebounds | 11 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 5 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 6 |
| Assists | 0 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Field Goals | 4-16 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 25.0% |
| Free Throws | 1-2 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Fouls | 4 |
Ayton’s scoring efficiency was not strong. He made only 4 of 16 shots.
However, judging his game only through scoring would miss an important part of the contest.
He collected five offensive rebounds, helping Los Angeles generate additional possessions. Those extra opportunities mattered because the Lakers finished with 16 offensive rebounds compared with 11 for Dallas.
The Lakers also finished with 57 total rebounds, 14 more than the Mavericks.
That rebounding advantage helped compensate for some of Ayton’s offensive struggles.
This is a useful lesson when reading player statistics. A center does not have to score 20 points to make a significant contribution. Offensive rebounds, defensive positioning and rim protection can influence the game in ways that do not appear in the scoring column.
Rui Hachimura Provided Efficient Scoring
Rui Hachimura finished with 17 points and 8 rebounds.
His shooting was particularly impressive:
| Statistic | Rui Hachimura |
| Points | 17 |
| Rebounds | 8 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Field Goals | 6-13 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 46.2% |
| Three-Pointers | 4-7 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 57.1% |
| Free Throws | 1-1 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 0 |
| Plus/Minus | +21 |
The combination of four made three-pointers and a 57.1 percent rate from deep gave Los Angeles an important perimeter scoring source.
His +21 plus/minus was also the best mark among the Lakers players listed in the box score.
Hachimura’s contribution became especially important because Dallas had successfully changed the game’s rhythm in the third quarter.
When a team faces a major comeback situation, efficient secondary scoring can prevent the opposing defense from concentrating entirely on the primary creator.
That is exactly where Hachimura’s shooting became valuable.
Marcus Smart Added Two-Way Production
Marcus Smart scored 13 points while contributing 7 rebounds, 3 assists and 2 blocks.
His shooting line was:
| Statistic | Marcus Smart |
| Points | 13 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 0 |
| Blocks | 2 |
| Field Goals | 4-10 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 40.0% |
| Three-Pointers | 2-4 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 50.0% |
| Free Throws | 3-5 |
| Turnovers | 3 |
| Fouls | 3 |
Smart’s 7 rebounds from the guard position were useful in a game where the Lakers won the overall rebounding battle.
His two blocks also provided defensive value.
Although he did not have the offensive efficiency of Doncic or Hachimura, his statistical contribution was balanced across multiple categories.
Jake LaRavia Supplied Efficient Starter Minutes
Jake LaRavia finished with 13 points, 6 rebounds and 1 assist.
He shot 4 of 8 from the field and 2 of 6 from three-point range. He also made 3 of 4 free throws.
His plus/minus was +12.
LaRavia’s 50 percent field-goal shooting helped maintain offensive balance around the Lakers’ primary stars.
He also collected six rebounds, contributing to the Lakers’ overall advantage on the glass.
Lakers Bench Production
The Lakers received useful contributions from several reserve players.
Jaxson Hayes scored 6 points while making all three of his field-goal attempts. He also recorded a rebound, an assist and a block.
Jarred Vanderbilt scored 8 points, grabbed 4 rebounds and made 3 of 6 field-goal attempts. He also made two three-pointers.
Gabe Vincent scored 0 points but contributed 2 steals, 1 rebound and 1 assist.
Drew Timme did not score but collected 3 rebounds, 1 assist and 2 steals.
Several Lakers players did not enter the game. Bronny James, Maxi Kleber and Dalton Knecht were listed as DNPs.
The important point is that Los Angeles did not depend entirely on its two biggest stars. Doncic and James drove the offense, but Hachimura, LaRavia, Smart, Vanderbilt and others supplied enough complementary production to keep the team competitive through the game’s major momentum swings.
Dallas Mavericks Player Statistics
Dallas had several strong individual performances despite losing the game.
Naji Marshall led the Mavericks with 21 points and 11 rebounds.
Max Christie scored 24 points, making him Dallas’ highest-scoring player in the detailed player box score.
Brandon Williams added 20 points.
Cooper Flagg finished with 16 points and led Dallas with 6 assists.
Caleb Martin scored 17 points.
Klay Thompson added 6 points off the bench.
The main Dallas numbers were:
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | FG | 3PT | FT |
| Max Christie | 24 | 2 | 3 | 8-18 | 4-10 | 4-4 |
| Naji Marshall | 21 | 11 | 2 | 7-15 | 0-3 | 7-10 |
| Brandon Williams | 20 | 4 | 4 | 8-17 | 0-1 | 4-5 |
| Caleb Martin | 17 | 3 | 1 | 6-10 | 3-4 | 2-2 |
| Cooper Flagg | 16 | 7 | 6 | 7-20 | 1-5 | 1-2 |
| Klay Thompson | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 0-2 |
| Dwight Powell | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Daniel Gafford | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
These numbers demonstrate that Dallas had enough individual scoring to win the game.
The problem was not simply a lack of offensive talent.
The bigger issue was what happened when Los Angeles increased its pressure and execution late in the contest.
Max Christie Was Dallas’ Leading Scorer
Max Christie scored 24 points for Dallas.
His line was:
| Statistic | Max Christie |
| Points | 24 |
| Rebounds | 2 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Field Goals | 8-18 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 44.4% |
| Three-Pointers | 4-10 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 40.0% |
| Free Throws | 4-4 |
| Turnovers | 0 |
| Fouls | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | -9 |
Christie’s four made three-pointers were particularly important because they provided Dallas with perimeter scoring.
He also avoided turnovers entirely.
His scoring was one of the clearest positive elements of Dallas’ offensive performance.
However, the -9 plus/minus shows that his scoring did not translate into a positive overall game margin during his minutes.
Plus/minus should never be treated as a complete individual evaluation, but in a game with large momentum swings it can provide useful context.
Naji Marshall Produced an All-Around Performance
Naji Marshall had 21 points and 11 rebounds.
His line also included 2 assists and 1 steal.
He shot 7 of 15 from the field and 7 of 10 at the free-throw line.
The 11 rebounds were tied for the highest individual total in the game with Deandre Ayton.
Marshall was particularly valuable during Dallas’ response after halftime.
His ability to score while also controlling the glass gave Dallas a strong two-way contribution from the wing.
However, his three-point shooting was not effective. He went 0 for 3 from beyond the arc.
That mattered because the Lakers could put more pressure on Dallas’ interior offense when perimeter shots were not falling consistently.
Brandon Williams Sparked Dallas in the Third Quarter
Brandon Williams scored 20 points and added 4 assists.
He made 8 of 17 field-goal attempts and converted 4 of 5 free throws.
His third-quarter scoring was especially important.
Dallas produced 35 points in the third period, and Williams was one of the players responsible for the offensive surge.
His 20 points helped keep Dallas within striking distance early and then pushed the Mavericks into the lead.
The problem for Dallas was that its third-quarter success did not continue into the fourth.
A strong comeback requires sustained execution, and Los Angeles was able to disrupt Dallas‘ offensive rhythm when the game became most important.
Cooper Flagg Showed Playmaking Value
Cooper Flagg recorded 16 points, 7 rebounds and 6 assists.
He also had 2 steals.
His line:
| Statistic | Cooper Flagg |
| Points | 16 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 6 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Blocks | 0 |
| Field Goals | 7-20 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 35.0% |
| Three-Pointers | 1-5 |
| Free Throws | 1-2 |
| Turnovers | 0 |
| Fouls | 3 |
The most impressive aspect of his statistical profile was his ability to contribute across several categories while committing no turnovers.
His six assists led Dallas.
However, his shooting efficiency was limited. He made 7 of 20 attempts from the field.
This is another example of why a box score needs context. Flagg’s scoring efficiency was not strong, but his rebounding, passing and defensive activity still gave Dallas valuable production.
Team Shooting Comparison
The overall shooting numbers favored Los Angeles.
| Category | Lakers | Mavericks |
| Field Goals | 40-90 | 39-94 |
| Field Goal % | 44% | 41% |
| Three-Pointers | 14-34 | 10-29 |
| Three-Point % | 41% | 34% |
| Free Throws | 22-29 | 22-29 |
| Free Throw % | 76% | 76% |
The Lakers attempted four fewer field goals but made one more.
That is a small difference in volume, but the efficiency gap mattered.
Los Angeles also made four more three-pointers than Dallas.
Because both teams made 22 free throws, the biggest shooting difference came from the field and especially from three-point range.
This is one of the clearest explanations for the final result.
Dallas had enough scoring to build a major lead, but Los Angeles was more efficient overall and more effective from beyond the arc.
Rebounding Was a Major Difference
The Lakers grabbed 57 rebounds compared with 43 for Dallas.
That is a 14-rebound advantage.
The offensive rebounding numbers were also important:
| Rebounding Category | Lakers | Mavericks |
| Total Rebounds | 57 | 43 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 16 | 11 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 41 | 32 |
Los Angeles therefore won both the offensive and defensive rebounding battles.
The five additional offensive rebounds created extra scoring opportunities.
The nine-rebound advantage on the defensive glass also reduced Dallas’ chances to extend possessions.
Ayton led the Lakers with 11 rebounds, while Marshall led Dallas with 11.
James and Hachimura each added eight rebounds for Los Angeles, while Flagg and Powell each recorded seven for Dallas.
The rebounding difference was one of the strongest structural advantages for the Lakers.
Ball Movement and Turnovers
Los Angeles recorded 26 assists compared with 22 for Dallas.
The Lakers did commit more turnovers, 14 compared with 11.
This creates an interesting contrast.
Dallas protected the ball slightly better, but Los Angeles generated more assists and produced more successful shooting.
The Lakers’ 26 assists suggest that their offense was not built entirely around individual isolation plays.
Doncic’s 11 assists were particularly important.
James added five, while Smart contributed three.
Dallas had six assists from Flagg and four from Williams.
The Mavericks’ lower turnover total helped them during their third-quarter comeback, but it was not enough to offset Los Angeles’ advantages in shooting and rebounding.
The Third Quarter Changed Everything
The third quarter was the turning point.
Los Angeles entered halftime with a 65-52 lead.
Dallas then scored 35 points while limiting Los Angeles to just 14.
That changed the scoreboard from a 13-point Lakers advantage to a Dallas lead.
This was not a small momentum swing.
Dallas completely controlled the third quarter.
The Mavericks attacked more effectively, created additional pressure around the Lakers’ defense and found enough scoring to turn the game around.
For Los Angeles, the challenge became psychological as well as tactical.
The Lakers had dominated the first half, then suddenly found themselves trailing.
This is where experienced players become especially valuable.
The Fourth Quarter Became a Test of Execution
The fourth quarter tells the story of the final result.
The Lakers scored 37 points.
Dallas scored only 23.
Los Angeles therefore won the final period by 14 points after losing the third quarter by 21.
That reversal explains the comeback.
The Lakers did not need to dominate the entire second half. They needed to recover their offensive efficiency and defend well enough to prevent Dallas from extending the lead.
The late-game sequence was particularly important.
Los Angeles erased a 15-point deficit and eventually regained control.
James became more aggressive offensively, while Doncic continued creating opportunities and Hachimura provided important perimeter scoring.
The result was a decisive late-game swing.
What the Advanced Numbers Suggest
The basic box score already explains much of the game, but several additional observations make the result easier to understand.
First, the Lakers had a clear rebounding advantage.
Second, they shot better from the field.
Third, they made more three-pointers.
Fourth, they produced more assists.
Fifth, they recovered from their worst quarter rather than allowing the third-quarter collapse to determine the result.
Dallas had advantages too.
The Mavericks committed three fewer turnovers.
They scored 50 points in the paint compared with 48 for Los Angeles.
They also scored 20 fast-break points compared with 18 for the Lakers.
That means Dallas did not lose because it was ineffective in every area.
Instead, Los Angeles won the categories that were most important over the full 48 minutes.
Why the Lakers Won Despite the Third-Quarter Collapse
The simplest answer is that Los Angeles was better at both ends during the decisive moments.
The Lakers entered halftime with control.
Dallas then produced an outstanding third quarter.
But the Lakers had enough shooting, rebounding and playmaking to recover.
Doncic’s 33 points and 11 assists provided the offensive foundation.
James’ 17 points included a major fourth-quarter contribution.
Hachimura’s 17 points came with excellent three-point efficiency.
Ayton’s 11 rebounds helped the Lakers dominate the glass.
Smart and LaRavia also provided balanced production from the starting lineup.
This combination made the Lakers difficult to stop once the game tightened.
What Dallas Did Well
The Mavericks deserve credit for the third-quarter response.
Scoring 35 points in a quarter against a Lakers team that had controlled the opening half required strong offensive execution.
Dallas also had five players score at least 16 points:
- Max Christie: 24
- Naji Marshall: 21
- Brandon Williams: 20
- Caleb Martin: 17
- Cooper Flagg: 16
That is substantial scoring distribution.
Dallas also had strong contributions from the starting lineup.
Martin shot 6 of 10 from the field and 3 of 4 from three-point range.
Christie made four threes.
Marshall produced a double-double.
Flagg supplied six assists.
The problem was that the offense could not maintain that level when the Lakers increased their pressure in the fourth quarter.
What Los Angeles Did Well
The Lakers’ biggest strength was balance.
Doncic was the offensive leader, but he was not alone.
James, Hachimura, Smart and LaRavia all scored at least 13 points.
The Lakers also had multiple players contributing on the glass.
Ayton led with 11 rebounds.
James and Hachimura each had eight.
Doncic had eight.
Smart had seven.
That kind of distribution is valuable because it reduces the risk of one player being completely responsible for winning the game.
Los Angeles also shot 41 percent from three-point range.
That was four percentage points better than Dallas’ 34 percent.
The Lakers’ 14 made threes compared with Dallas’ 10 produced a meaningful scoring advantage.
Lakers vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Biggest Takeaways
When reviewing the lakers vs dallas mavericks match player stats, several conclusions stand out.
Luka Doncic controlled the game
His 33 points and 11 assists made him the central offensive figure.
LeBron James mattered most late
His overall total was 17 points, but his fourth-quarter scoring was critical during the comeback.
Ayton dominated the glass
His 11 rebounds, including five offensive boards, helped Los Angeles control possession.
Hachimura provided efficient perimeter scoring
His four made threes on seven attempts were an important source of spacing and offense.
Dallas had enough scoring to win
Christie, Marshall, Williams, Martin and Flagg all reached at least 16 points.
Rebounding separated the teams
Los Angeles finished with 57 rebounds compared with 43 for Dallas.
Three-point shooting favored Los Angeles
The Lakers made 14 threes compared with 10 for Dallas.
The fourth quarter decided the game
Los Angeles scored 37 points while Dallas scored 23.
How to Read These Player Statistics Correctly
A common mistake when reading NBA box scores is to focus only on the highest point total.
That approach misses important parts of the game.
For example, Ayton scored only nine points but grabbed 11 rebounds.
Flagg scored 16 points but also recorded six assists and seven rebounds.
James scored 17 points but became especially important during the fourth quarter.
Doncic scored 33 points, but his 11 assists were equally important to understanding his offensive role.
The best way to analyze a box score is to combine several categories:
- Scoring efficiency
- Rebounding
- Assists
- Turnovers
- Three-point shooting
- Free-throw production
- Defensive statistics
- Plus/minus
- Game context
- Quarter-by-quarter performance
This approach gives a much more accurate picture of individual impact.
Lakers vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats and Season-Series Context
This matchup was especially meaningful because Los Angeles had already defeated Dallas earlier in the season.
The previous listed meeting ended with a 129-119 Lakers victory on November 29.
That made this 116-110 result the Lakers’ second win in the season series at that point.
The matchup also carried additional significance because Doncic was facing his former team in Dallas.
That background added emotional weight to the game, but the statistical story remained straightforward.
The Lakers won because they recovered from a major third-quarter collapse and finished the game with superior execution.
The NBA’s official reporting also records Doncic at 33 points, eight rebounds and 11 assists in the contest, while the official game information lists the attendance at 19,880.
Important Date Note
There is a minor date-label difference worth clarifying for readers.
The supplied game data identifies the matchup as January 25, 2026, while the NBA’s official game page labels the contest January 24, 2026 in its local game listing. The game information associated with the NBA page shows Sunday, January 25, 2026 at 1:30 AM, which explains why different databases may display January 24 or January 25 depending on the date and time convention being used.
For SEO and reader clarity, the article can retain January 25, 2026 if that is the date used in your source data, while noting the official NBA listing convention.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the leading scorer in the Lakers vs Mavericks game?
Luka Doncic led all Lakers scorers with 33 points. Max Christie was Dallas’ leading scorer with 24 points.
How many points did Luka Doncic score against the Mavericks?
Luka Doncic scored 33 points. He also recorded 8 rebounds and 11 assists.
Who led the Lakers in rebounds?
Deandre Ayton led Los Angeles with 11 rebounds. He collected five offensive rebounds and six defensive rebounds.
Who led the Mavericks in rebounds?
Naji Marshall led Dallas with 11 rebounds. He also scored 21 points.
What was the final score between the Lakers and Mavericks?
The Lakers defeated the Mavericks 116-110.
How did the Lakers win after trailing in the fourth quarter?
Los Angeles produced a 37-point fourth quarter after Dallas had taken control during the third. The Lakers combined improved offensive execution, rebounding and perimeter shooting to regain the lead and close out the game.
Conclusion
The lakers vs dallas mavericks match player stats reveal a game defined by momentum, efficiency and late execution.
Luka Doncic was the statistical centerpiece for Los Angeles with 33 points and 11 assists. Deandre Ayton controlled the boards with 11 rebounds, while LeBron James supplied important fourth-quarter scoring. Rui Hachimura added efficient perimeter production, and the Lakers received enough supporting contributions to withstand Dallas’ huge third-quarter surge.
For Dallas, Max Christie led the team with 24 points, Naji Marshall produced 21 points and 11 rebounds, Brandon Williams scored 20, Caleb Martin added 17, and Cooper Flagg delivered 16 points, 7 rebounds and 6 assists.
The most important team-level differences were clear. Los Angeles shot 44 percent from the field compared with Dallas at 41 percent, made 14 three-pointers compared with 10, collected 57 rebounds compared with 43, and recorded 26 assists compared with 22.
Most importantly, the Lakers responded when the game appeared to be slipping away. Dallas dominated the third quarter 35-14, but Los Angeles answered with a 37-23 fourth quarter and turned a 15-point deficit into a six-point victory.
That combination of individual star production and team-level execution is what ultimately explains the 116-110 result.
