San Antonio Spurs vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats
If you are searching for san antonio spurs vs la clippers match player stats, the March 7, 2026 meeting between these teams provides a particularly interesting statistical story. The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Los Angeles Clippers 116-112 at Frost Bank Center, but the final score does not fully explain how the game developed. The Clippers controlled the first half, San Antonio produced a major second-half turnaround, and the deciding numbers came from rebounding, three-point shooting, playmaking, and the Spurs’ ability to generate more defensive resistance late in the game.
The matchup also featured two of the game’s biggest stars in different roles. Kawhi Leonard led all scorers with 30 points for Los Angeles, while Victor Wembanyama finished with 27 points and 10 rebounds for San Antonio. De’Aaron Fox added 9 assists for the Spurs, and Jordan Miller led the Clippers with 6 assists. Those individual numbers become more meaningful when viewed alongside the team statistics.
This article breaks down the complete statistical picture from the March 7, 2026 game, including scoring, shooting, rebounds, assists, turnovers, three-point efficiency, free throws, defensive production, and the individual performances that shaped the result.
San Antonio Spurs vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Spurs entered the game with a strong 46-17 record and a 23-6 home record, while the Clippers were 30-32 overall and 14-19 on the road. That difference in home performance was an important part of the pregame statistical context.
San Antonio ultimately improved its position in the season series by taking Game 1, winning 116-112.
Final score
| Team | Final Score |
| San Antonio Spurs | 116 |
| Los Angeles Clippers | 112 |
The game was played at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, with an announced attendance of 18,711.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring shows why the final result was more complicated than a simple four-point victory.
| Quarter | Clippers | Spurs |
| 1st | 32 | 25 |
| 2nd | 34 | 21 |
| 3rd | 26 | 35 |
| 4th | 20 | 35 |
| Total | 112 | 116 |
Los Angeles scored 66 points during the first half. San Antonio scored only 46.
That 20-point halftime deficit is the clearest indication that the Spurs did not win by controlling the game from start to finish. Instead, they changed the statistical direction of the matchup after halftime.
San Antonio scored 70 points in the second half, including 35 in each of the final two quarters. Los Angeles scored 46 after halftime.
That reversal is one of the most important details in the entire box score.
The Biggest Statistical Story: San Antonio’s Second-Half Turnaround
A four-point final margin can sometimes make a game look evenly balanced from beginning to end. This game was not.
The quarter scores tell a much more dramatic story.
The Clippers won the first quarter 32-25 and then extended their advantage by winning the second quarter 34-21. At halftime, Los Angeles held a 66-46 lead.
San Antonio then won the third quarter 35-26.
The fourth quarter was even more decisive. The Spurs scored 35 points while holding the Clippers to 20.
That means San Antonio outscored Los Angeles by 24 points across the second half.
This is especially significant because the Spurs did not need a major advantage in field-goal percentage to win. Both teams finished close to 50 percent from the field.
The difference came from how San Antonio combined several smaller advantages:
- 52 rebounds compared with 41 for Los Angeles
- 29 assists compared with 22
- 17 made three-pointers compared with 12
- 7 blocks compared with 3
- 35 fourth-quarter points compared with 20
- A strong second-half offensive surge
The comeback therefore looks less like one player suddenly taking over and more like a team-wide statistical shift.
Kawhi Leonard’s 30-Point Performance
Kawhi Leonard was the Clippers’ leading scorer with 30 points.
That made him the highest individual scorer in the game, ahead of Victor Wembanyama’s 27.
Leonard also led Los Angeles in rebounds with 9, giving him a significant all-around statistical contribution.
His 30-point scoring output was particularly important because the Clippers still lost despite receiving the game’s highest individual scoring total.
That distinction matters when evaluating player performance.
A leading scorer does not automatically have the most influential game.
Leonard’s 30 points clearly demonstrate scoring effectiveness, but San Antonio’s superior team rebounding, assist production, three-point volume, and defensive statistics helped offset the Clippers star’s scoring output.
For Los Angeles, the challenge was not simply finding points from Leonard. The team needed enough production around him to protect the early lead.
The Clippers scored 66 first-half points, which indicates that their offense was functioning effectively for a substantial portion of the game. Their problem came later.
They scored only 46 points in the second half and just 20 in the fourth quarter.
That fourth-quarter decline ultimately became decisive.
Victor Wembanyama’s 27 Points and 10 Rebounds
Victor Wembanyama finished with 27 points and 10 rebounds, making him San Antonio’s leading scorer and top rebounder.
His double-double was one of the clearest individual indicators of San Antonio’s interior influence.
The 10 rebounds also contributed to a larger team advantage. The Spurs collected 52 rebounds compared with 41 for the Clippers, a difference of 11.
That is a substantial gap in a game decided by only four points.
Wembanyama’s contribution therefore cannot be judged only by his 27 points.
His 10 rebounds were part of a broader San Antonio effort to control possessions and limit second-chance opportunities.
The Spurs also finished with 7 blocks, compared with 3 for Los Angeles. While the supplied data does not identify every individual block, the team total shows that San Antonio generated significantly more rim protection.
That combination of scoring, rebounding, and defensive presence helps explain why Wembanyama’s performance remained important even though Leonard scored three more points.
De’Aaron Fox’s 9 Assists
De’Aaron Fox led the Spurs with 9 assists.
That is an important number when analyzing San Antonio’s offensive improvement after halftime.
The Spurs finished with 29 assists as a team, seven more than the Clippers’ 22.
This difference suggests that San Antonio’s second-half recovery was supported by ball movement rather than depending entirely on individual shot creation.
Assists do not tell the complete story of offensive quality, but they provide useful context.
San Antonio made 46 field goals. With 29 team assists, a large share of those made baskets were connected to recorded passing plays.
Fox’s 9 assists were especially notable because they came within an offense that also produced 17 made three-pointers.
When a team combines perimeter shooting with strong assist production, defenders face more difficult decisions. Closing out on shooters can create driving opportunities, while collapsing toward the paint can open passing lanes.
The available game data does not provide every play-level detail, so it would be excessive to assign every offensive adjustment to Fox. However, his 9 assists clearly identify him as the Spurs’ primary statistical facilitator in this matchup.
Jordan Miller’s 6 Assists
Jordan Miller led the Clippers with 6 assists.
His total was three assists lower than Fox’s team-leading figure for San Antonio.
Los Angeles finished with 22 assists overall, meaning Miller accounted for a meaningful portion of the Clippers’ recorded passing production.
The assist numbers also provide an interesting contrast between the teams.
| Player | Team | Key Statistic |
| Victor Wembanyama | Spurs | 27 points, 10 rebounds |
| De’Aaron Fox | Spurs | 9 assists |
| Kawhi Leonard | Clippers | 30 points, 9 rebounds |
| Jordan Miller | Clippers | 6 assists |
This table captures four of the most important individual statistical contributions without pretending that a single category defines overall player value.
Team Shooting Comparison
The shooting numbers were surprisingly close in one major category.
The Spurs shot 46-for-95 from the field, or 48 percent.
The Clippers shot 42-for-86, or 49 percent.
Los Angeles therefore had a slight field-goal percentage advantage.
That is important because it demonstrates that San Antonio did not win simply by being more accurate overall from the field.
In fact, the Clippers made 49 percent of their attempts compared with 48 percent for the Spurs.
The Spurs won despite that one-percent disadvantage.
Field-goal efficiency
| Category | Clippers | Spurs |
| Field goals made | 42 | 46 |
| Field goals attempted | 86 | 95 |
| FG percentage | 49% | 48% |
San Antonio attempted nine more shots and made four more field goals.
That distinction is crucial.
Percentage tells you how efficiently a team shot. Attempts tell you how many opportunities it generated.
The Spurs had more attempts, and those additional opportunities helped compensate for their slightly lower shooting percentage.
Three-Point Shooting Was a Major Difference
The three-point numbers provide a much clearer explanation of San Antonio’s offensive advantage.
The Spurs made 17 of 41 attempts from beyond the arc, shooting 41 percent.
The Clippers made 12 of 33, shooting 36 percent.
| Category | Clippers | Spurs |
| 3-pointers made | 12 | 17 |
| 3-point attempts | 33 | 41 |
| 3-point percentage | 36% | 41% |
San Antonio made five more three-pointers.
Those five additional three-pointers represent 15 additional points.
That is a meaningful margin in a game decided by four points.
The Spurs also attempted eight more three-pointers.
This suggests that San Antonio’s offensive approach created both more perimeter volume and better three-point efficiency.
The difference was especially valuable because the teams were nearly identical in overall field-goal percentage.
In other words, the three-point line created a major separation that the basic field-goal percentage did not show.
Free-Throw Shooting Favored the Clippers
Free throws tell a different story.
The Clippers made 16 of 20 attempts, shooting 80 percent.
The Spurs made 7 of 14, shooting only 50 percent.
| Category | Clippers | Spurs |
| Free throws made | 16 | 7 |
| Free throws attempted | 20 | 14 |
| FT percentage | 80% | 50% |
Los Angeles had a nine-point advantage in made free throws.
That is significant.
San Antonio could easily have been punished for its poor free-throw efficiency in a four-point game. Instead, the Spurs created enough value through three-point shooting, rebounding, assists, and overall field-goal volume to overcome the free-throw disadvantage.
This is a good example of why one box-score category should never be analyzed in isolation.
The Clippers were more accurate from the field and much better from the free-throw line.
Yet San Antonio still won.
Rebounding Was One of the Decisive Differences
San Antonio collected 52 rebounds.
Los Angeles collected 41.
That gives the Spurs an 11-rebound advantage.
For a game that ended with a four-point margin, that difference deserves serious attention.
Rebounds can create additional possessions, prevent opponents from extending possessions, and influence transition opportunities.
The data supplied for this game does not break the rebounding total into offensive and defensive rebounds, so it would be inappropriate to claim a precise advantage in second-chance points.
Still, the overall rebounding difference is clear.
Wembanyama’s 10 rebounds were especially important because he led San Antonio individually in that category.
Leonard’s 9 rebounds led the Clippers, meaning the two star players were relatively close individually.
The larger difference came at the team level.
San Antonio received more total rebounding production from its roster.
Assist Comparison Shows San Antonio’s Ball Movement
The Spurs finished with 29 assists.
The Clippers finished with 22.
That is a seven-assist advantage for San Antonio.
| Team | Assists |
| Spurs | 29 |
| Clippers | 22 |
The difference is meaningful because San Antonio also made more field goals.
The Spurs converted 46 field goals, while the Clippers converted 42.
San Antonio therefore combined more made shots with more assists.
Fox’s 9 assists were the largest individual contribution in this category.
Miller’s 6 assists were the Clippers’ highest.
The assist margin also fits the game’s second-half narrative. San Antonio needed to generate more efficient offense after trailing by 20 points at halftime, and greater team passing production was part of that statistical recovery.
Turnovers: A Small Advantage for the Clippers
The Clippers committed 9 turnovers.
The Spurs committed 12.
Los Angeles therefore had three fewer turnovers.
This was one category where the Clippers held the advantage.
Turnovers can be especially important in close games because they can lead directly to transition opportunities.
Despite having fewer turnovers, however, Los Angeles could not turn that advantage into a victory.
This again demonstrates how several statistical categories interacted.
The Clippers had:
- Better overall field-goal percentage
- Better free-throw percentage
- Fewer turnovers
- More steals
The Spurs had:
- More rebounds
- More assists
- More made three-pointers
- Better three-point percentage
- More blocks
- A stronger second half
The winning formula came from the total statistical profile rather than one isolated advantage.
Steals and Blocks Reveal a Different Defensive Picture
Los Angeles recorded 12 steals.
San Antonio recorded 6.
That is a six-steal advantage for the Clippers.
The Spurs, however, led in blocks.
San Antonio recorded 7 blocks compared with 3 for Los Angeles.
| Defensive category | Clippers | Spurs |
| Steals | 12 | 6 |
| Blocks | 3 | 7 |
This is an interesting defensive contrast.
The Clippers produced more steals, suggesting greater activity in creating takeaways.
The Spurs produced more blocks, pointing toward greater rim protection.
Neither statistic should be treated as a complete measure of defense.
A team can defend well without recording many steals or blocks, and high steal numbers can sometimes reflect aggressive defensive tactics that also create openings.
For this particular game, the most useful conclusion is simply that the teams generated defensive impact in different ways.
Why the Clippers Lost Despite Leading Scorer Kawhi Leonard
A common mistake in postgame analysis is to equate the highest individual scoring total with the best overall team performance.
Leonard scored 30 points.
The Clippers still lost.
That does not mean Leonard played poorly. The supplied statistics clearly show that he was the game’s leading scorer and the Clippers’ top rebounder with 9 boards.
The bigger issue was the team-level statistical balance.
Los Angeles held several advantages, but San Antonio created larger structural advantages in other areas.
The Spurs made five more three-pointers.
They collected 11 more rebounds.
They recorded seven more assists.
They had four more blocks.
Most importantly, they dramatically changed the scoring pattern after halftime.
The Clippers scored 66 points in the first half but only 46 in the second.
That 20-point reduction was the most damaging trend in their performance.
Why Wembanyama’s 27 Points Were More Than a Scoring Stat
Wembanyama’s 27 points were important, but the more revealing number may be his 10 rebounds.
The Spurs needed to recover from a huge halftime deficit.
A comeback requires more than scoring.
It requires possessions.
Rebounding helps create possessions while ending the opponent’s opportunities.
San Antonio’s 52 rebounds compared with 41 for Los Angeles indicate that the Spurs controlled that area strongly.
Wembanyama’s double-double therefore fits directly into the broader team story.
His production was not limited to putting the ball in the basket.
He also contributed to the Spurs’ control of the glass and their seven-block team total.
That is why a simple comparison of Leonard’s 30 points against Wembanyama’s 27 does not adequately describe their impact.
The Four-Quarter Story
Looking at the game one quarter at a time makes the result easier to understand.
First quarter
The Clippers opened with a 32-25 advantage.
Los Angeles immediately established offensive momentum.
Second quarter
The Clippers expanded their lead with a 34-21 quarter.
At halftime, Los Angeles led 66-46.
This was the strongest period of the game for the Clippers.
Third quarter
San Antonio responded with 35 points.
The Spurs cut into the deficit by winning the quarter 35-26.
The comeback had become realistic.
Fourth quarter
The decisive swing came in the final period.
San Antonio scored 35 points.
Los Angeles scored 20.
The Spurs won the fourth quarter by 15 points and completed the comeback.
The 35-point fourth quarter also matched San Antonio’s third-quarter total, showing that the offensive improvement was not limited to one brief burst.
The Most Important Numbers at a Glance
Here are the statistics that best explain the final result:
| Category | Clippers | Spurs | Advantage |
| Final score | 112 | 116 | Spurs |
| Field-goal percentage | 49% | 48% | Clippers |
| Three-point percentage | 36% | 41% | Spurs |
| Three-pointers made | 12 | 17 | Spurs |
| Free-throw percentage | 80% | 50% | Clippers |
| Rebounds | 41 | 52 | Spurs |
| Assists | 22 | 29 | Spurs |
| Turnovers | 9 | 12 | Clippers |
| Steals | 12 | 6 | Clippers |
| Blocks | 3 | 7 | Spurs |
This table reveals the central statistical lesson.
The Clippers won some efficiency and ball-security categories.
The Spurs won several possession, playmaking, perimeter shooting, and interior defense categories.
In a four-point game, those differences were enough to decide the result.
What the Player Stats Tell Us About Each Team
San Antonio Spurs
San Antonio’s statistics point toward a balanced team performance.
Wembanyama led the team with 27 points and 10 rebounds.
Fox led the team with 9 assists.
The team as a whole made 17 three-pointers, grabbed 52 rebounds, recorded 29 assists, and blocked 7 shots.
That is a broad statistical contribution across the roster.
The Spurs did not rely on one category.
They overcame poor free-throw shooting and a slight field-goal percentage disadvantage by producing more three-point offense and more total field-goal attempts.
Los Angeles Clippers
The Clippers had a strong individual scoring performance from Leonard.
He scored 30 points and collected 9 rebounds.
Miller led the team with 6 assists.
Los Angeles also shot 49 percent from the field and 80 percent from the free-throw line.
The team recorded 12 steals and committed only 9 turnovers.
Those numbers show that the Clippers had several areas of strength.
Their biggest statistical weakness was what happened after halftime.
A team that leads by 20 points at halftime but scores only 46 second-half points has allowed the opponent to completely change the game’s momentum.
That is ultimately what happened here.
San Antonio Spurs vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats: What Should You Look At First?
When analyzing a box score like this, the most useful approach is to avoid starting with the final score alone.
Instead, examine the game in this order:
1. Start with the quarter scores
The quarter breakdown immediately reveals whether the game was close throughout or changed dramatically.
Here, it reveals a major comeback.
2. Compare shooting volume and efficiency
The Spurs shot 48 percent compared with 49 percent for the Clippers.
That tells you San Antonio did not win through overall field-goal efficiency.
Then look at three-point shooting.
The Spurs made 17 threes at 41 percent, compared with 12 at 36 percent for Los Angeles.
That explains much more.
3. Check rebounding
A difference of 11 rebounds is too large to ignore in a four-point game.
4. Look at assists
San Antonio’s seven-assist advantage supports the idea that the Spurs generated more team-based offensive production.
5. Check turnovers and steals
The Clippers had fewer turnovers and more steals.
This prevents an overly simplistic conclusion that San Antonio dominated every statistical category.
6. Compare individual stars with team results
Leonard scored more points than Wembanyama.
But Wembanyama produced a double-double, and San Antonio won the team-level battle in several categories.
This is the difference between player statistics and game analysis.
A Deeper Look at the Game’s Statistical Balance
One of the most useful lessons from this matchup is that basketball outcomes are rarely explained by a single percentage.
Consider the field-goal numbers.
Los Angeles shot 49 percent.
San Antonio shot 48 percent.
If you looked only at that statistic, you might expect the Clippers to have won.
But San Antonio attempted nine more field goals.
The Spurs also made five more three-pointers.
They had 11 more rebounds.
They had seven more assists.
They had four more blocks.
Those additional advantages outweighed Los Angeles’ superior shooting percentage.
This is why serious box-score analysis should consider both efficiency and volume.
A team can shoot slightly worse while generating enough additional opportunities and higher-value shots to score more points.
That is exactly the type of statistical relationship visible in this matchup.
What the Game Says About Clutch Performance
The final quarter deserves special attention.
San Antonio scored 35 points.
Los Angeles scored 20.
That 15-point fourth-quarter advantage was more than enough to erase the game’s earlier momentum.
The Spurs’ performance also demonstrates the importance of evaluating a game based on its full timeline.
A team can dominate the first half and still lose if its offensive production collapses late.
The Clippers scored 32 and 34 points in the opening two quarters.
Then they scored 26 and 20.
Their scoring declined in each of the final two quarters.
San Antonio moved in the opposite direction:
25 points, then 21, followed by 35 and 35.
The two scoring trajectories effectively crossed.
That is perhaps the clearest statistical representation of the game.
What This Result Means for the Season Series
The supplied game data identifies this matchup as Game 1 of the season series.
San Antonio won 116-112.
That put the Spurs ahead 1-0 in the season series after this meeting.
The game also came with contrasting standings information in the supplied data, with San Antonio identified as a top team in the Southwest and Los Angeles positioned in the Pacific.
Those records provide context, but the individual game statistics remain the strongest evidence for evaluating what happened on March 7.
Important Data Note
The player-level information supplied for this analysis includes the leading scorers, top rebounders, and top assist leaders, but it does not provide a complete player-by-player box score for every player who appeared.
For that reason, this article does not invent individual statistics that were not supplied.
For example, the available data confirms:
- Wembanyama: 27 points and 10 rebounds
- Fox: 9 assists
- Leonard: 30 points and 9 rebounds
- Miller: 6 assists
It does not provide every player’s complete minutes, field goals, three-pointers, free throws, steals, blocks, or turnovers.
A trustworthy statistical article should distinguish between confirmed data and information that is not available in the source material.
That is especially important for readers using game statistics for research, fantasy analysis, historical comparisons, or sports content.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the leading scorer in the Spurs vs Clippers game on March 7, 2026?
Kawhi Leonard was the game’s leading scorer with 30 points for the Los Angeles Clippers. Victor Wembanyama led the Spurs with 27 points.
What was the final score of the Spurs vs Clippers game?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Los Angeles Clippers 116-112 at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio.
How many rebounds did Victor Wembanyama have?
Victor Wembanyama recorded 10 rebounds and led the Spurs in that category.
How many assists did De’Aaron Fox have?
De’Aaron Fox led San Antonio with 9 assists.
How did the Spurs come back from a 20-point halftime deficit?
San Antonio dramatically improved its scoring after halftime. The Spurs scored 35 points in both the third and fourth quarters, while the Clippers scored 26 and 20 respectively.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
The Spurs shot better from three-point range. San Antonio made 17 of 41 three-point attempts for 41 percent, while Los Angeles made 12 of 33 for 36 percent.
Conclusion
The March 7, 2026 meeting between San Antonio and Los Angeles was a strong example of why basketball statistics need context.
The Clippers had the game’s leading scorer in Kawhi Leonard, who finished with 30 points and 9 rebounds. They also shot 49 percent from the field, made 80 percent of their free throws, committed only 9 turnovers, and recorded 12 steals.
Yet the Spurs found enough advantages to overcome those strengths.
Victor Wembanyama delivered 27 points and 10 rebounds. De’Aaron Fox produced 9 assists. San Antonio made 17 three-pointers, collected 52 rebounds, recorded 29 assists, and blocked 7 shots.
The decisive factor was the second half.
After trailing 66-46 at halftime, San Antonio scored 70 points over the final two quarters. The Spurs scored 35 points in the third quarter and another 35 in the fourth, while Los Angeles managed only 46 combined points during the same period.
The final score of 116-112 therefore tells only part of the story.
The deeper statistical picture shows a team that overcame a poor start through improved scoring, superior rebounding, stronger three-point production, greater assist volume, and more rim protection.
For anyone studying san antonio spurs vs la clippers match player stats, the most useful takeaway is not simply who scored the most points. The more meaningful analysis comes from connecting individual performances with team-level statistics and the quarter-by-quarter flow of the game.
