Sacramento kings vs golden state warriors match player stats
The sacramento kings vs golden state warriors match player stats from April 8, 2026 tell the story of a tightly contested 110-105 Golden State victory at Chase Center. The Warriors survived a strong Sacramento start, used a 41-point second quarter to create separation, and then held off the Kings after Sacramento fought back in the third period. The official NBA game summary confirms the 105-110 final score, the quarter-by-quarter scoring, and the major individual performances.
This was not simply a game decided by one superstar. Golden State received 21 points from De’Anthony Melton, 20 from Brandin Podziemski, 17 from Stephen Curry, 14 from Charles Bassey, 14 from Pat Spencer, 12 from Gary Payton II, and 9 from Seth Curry. Sacramento, meanwhile, had a balanced scoring effort led by Killian Hayes with 18 points, Maxime Raynaud with 17, Doug McDermott with 16, Precious Achiuwa with 13, Nique Clifford with 12, and Daeqwon Plowden with 11.
The result is especially interesting when the individual numbers are examined alongside shooting efficiency, turnovers, rebounding, assists, and plus/minus. The raw box score shows who scored, but the deeper statistical picture explains why Golden State won despite Sacramento shooting a slightly better percentage from the field.
Game Overview
Golden State entered the game looking to stop a difficult stretch, while Sacramento was trying to finish the season strongly despite a challenging record. The Warriors eventually prevailed 110-105 in front of 18,064 fans at Chase Center in San Francisco.
The game was played on April 7 in San Francisco local time, with the official NBA game information dated April 8. The NBA’s official recap also reported that Golden State snapped a four-game losing streak and that Stephen Curry was playing his second game back after missing 27 games because of a right knee injury.
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Sacramento Kings | 26 | 27 | 28 | 24 | 105 |
| Golden State Warriors | 25 | 41 | 19 | 25 | 110 |
The five-point final margin hides how dramatically the game changed during the second quarter.
Sacramento led 26-25 after the opening period. The Kings then added 27 points in the second quarter, but Golden State exploded for 41. That 14-point difference in the second quarter became the most important scoring swing of the night.
Sacramento responded with 28 points in the third quarter while holding Golden State to only 19. That brought the Kings back into contention.
The Warriors then produced 25 points in the fourth quarter and limited Sacramento to 24, doing just enough to secure the victory.
sacramento kings vs golden state warriors match player stats: Sacramento Leaders
Sacramento did not have a single dominant 30-point performance, but several players contributed meaningful production.
Killian Hayes led the Kings with 18 points off the bench. Maxime Raynaud scored 17 points, while Doug McDermott added 16. Precious Achiuwa contributed 13 points and six rebounds, and Nique Clifford finished with 12.
The scoring distribution is important because it shows Sacramento’s offense was not dependent on one player.
Killian Hayes
Killian Hayes was Sacramento’s leading scorer with 18 points.
His complete line was:
- 18 points
- 6-of-13 field goals
- 3-of-7 three-pointers
- 3-of-4 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 4 steals
The four steals stand out immediately.
Hayes combined scoring with defensive activity, and his ability to create turnovers gave Sacramento extra opportunities. His 3-of-7 shooting from three-point range was also valuable because Golden State’s defensive structure can become more difficult to attack when opponents cannot stretch the floor.
However, three turnovers reduced some of the value created by his playmaking.
His overall contribution was much broader than his 18-point total suggests.
Maxime Raynaud
Maxime Raynaud produced 17 points and seven rebounds according to the supplied player data.
His shooting line was highly efficient:
- 17 points
- 7-of-14 field goals
- 0-of-1 from three
- 3-of-3 free throws
- 7 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 2 turnovers
Raynaud’s interior scoring was one of Sacramento’s more reliable sources of offense.
The NBA’s official recap also highlighted Raynaud’s 17-point performance and noted that he was playing on his 23rd birthday.
His 7-of-14 shooting meant he converted exactly half of his attempts from the field. He also made every free throw he attempted, giving Sacramento efficient scoring without requiring a large volume of possessions.
Doug McDermott
Doug McDermott provided an important shooting spark from the bench.
He finished with:
- 16 points
- 5-of-13 field goals
- 4-of-10 three-pointers
- 2-of-2 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 2 turnovers
- 1 steal
- 1 block
The most important part of his line was the four made three-pointers.
McDermott’s 40% accuracy from beyond the arc was slightly below Sacramento’s overall three-point percentage of 35%, but his willingness to take perimeter shots helped create spacing.
For a team that needed to recover from Golden State’s second-quarter surge, reliable outside shooting was essential.
Precious Achiuwa
Precious Achiuwa started for Sacramento and contributed across several categories.
He recorded:
- 13 points
- 6-of-14 field goals
- 6 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 2 turnovers
- 1 block
Achiuwa’s four assists are particularly useful when evaluating his performance because they show that his contribution was not limited to finishing around the basket.
His plus/minus was +3, one of Sacramento’s better marks among the listed players.
Daeqwon Plowden
Daeqwon Plowden scored 11 points on efficient shooting.
He went:
- 4-of-7 from the field
- 3-of-6 from three-point range
- 1 rebound
- 1 assist
- 1 block
His three made three-pointers were a positive offensive contribution.
The interesting part of Plowden’s performance is that his scoring efficiency was strong, but his -12 plus/minus suggests that the minutes he played were associated with Golden State winning its stretches of the game.
This is a useful reminder that plus/minus should not be treated as a complete individual performance grade. A player can shoot well while his lineup still loses its overall minutes.
Devin Carter
Devin Carter finished with six points but contributed more as a distributor.
His line:
- 6 points
- 3-of-5 field goals
- 3 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 1 turnover
- 1 steal
The five assists were tied for the highest total among Sacramento players.
Carter’s efficiency was also good because he made three of his five field-goal attempts.
His scoring volume was limited, but his playmaking helped Sacramento generate offense without forcing him to take difficult shots.
Nique Clifford
Nique Clifford recorded:
- 12 points
- 4-of-14 field goals
- 1-of-4 three-pointers
- 3-of-4 free throws
- 6 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 2 turnovers
- 2 steals
The six rebounds and two steals helped offset a difficult shooting night.
His 4-of-14 field-goal performance was one of the less efficient shooting lines among Sacramento’s main contributors, making his defensive activity and rebounding especially important.
Sacramento’s Bench Production
The Kings’ bench was a major part of the scoring picture.
Their listed reserves produced:
- Doug McDermott: 16 points
- Dylan Cardwell: 8 points
- Malik Monk: 4 points
- Killian Hayes: 18 points
That is 46 combined points from those four players.
Hayes was the most productive reserve scorer, while McDermott supplied perimeter shooting.
Dylan Cardwell’s offensive output was modest at eight points, but his defensive contribution was significant.
He shot 4-of-4 from the field, grabbed nine rebounds, and blocked three shots.
That made him one of Sacramento’s most efficient interior players in the game.
Golden State Player Statistics
Golden State’s offensive production was led by De’Anthony Melton, but the Warriors’ victory came from a much broader contribution.
Melton scored 21 points, Podziemski had 20, Curry scored 17, and Bassey added 14 points and 12 rebounds.
De’Anthony Melton
De’Anthony Melton was Golden State’s leading scorer with 21 points.
His line:
- 21 points
- 7-of-12 field goals
- 4-of-6 three-pointers
- 3-of-5 free throws
- 4 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 1 turnover
- 1 steal
This was arguably the most complete offensive performance of the game.
Melton shot 58.3% from the field and 66.7% from three-point range. He also contributed five assists while committing only one turnover.
That combination of scoring efficiency, perimeter shooting, and ball security is particularly valuable.
The NBA’s official recap identified Melton as Golden State’s leading scorer with 21 points.
Brandin Podziemski
Brandin Podziemski scored 20 points.
His statistics:
- 20 points
- 5-of-11 field goals
- 4-of-6 three-pointers
- 6-of-6 free throws
- 1 rebound
- 3 assists
- 2 turnovers
- 1 steal
- +8
His perfect 6-of-6 performance at the free-throw line was important.
He also shot 66.7% from three-point range.
The fourth quarter contained one of the game’s key moments when Stephen Curry tied the game at 104 with a three-pointer before assisting Podziemski for the go-ahead three on the following possession. The NBA’s official recap specifically highlighted that sequence. (NBA)
That sequence captures why Podziemski’s 20 points mattered beyond the total itself.
Stephen Curry
Stephen Curry finished with 17 points in his second game back from injury.
His line:
- 17 points
- 5-of-12 field goals
- 4-of-11 three-pointers
- 3-of-3 free throws
- 5 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 1 steal
- +6
Curry’s 17 points were not his largest scoring output, but his fourth-quarter influence was decisive.
He made the tying three-pointer with 2:38 remaining and then helped create the go-ahead Podziemski three on the next possession.
His 4-of-11 three-point shooting was not especially efficient by his standards, but the timing of his late shot-making was more important than his overall percentage.
This is one of the clearest examples of why box-score analysis needs context.
Charles Bassey
Charles Bassey produced one of Golden State’s most impressive statistical performances from the bench.
He recorded:
- 14 points
- 7-of-12 field goals
- 12 rebounds
- 2 steals
- 2 blocks
- +9
His 12 rebounds were the most in the game.
He also shot 58.3% from the field.
Bassey’s combination of rebounding, interior finishing, steals, and blocks gave Golden State a strong defensive presence.
He did not need to score 20 points to have a major impact.
Pat Spencer
Pat Spencer scored 14 points.
He finished with:
- 14 points
- 5-of-16 field goals
- 3-of-8 three-pointers
- 1-of-2 free throws
- 2 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 1 steal
His shooting efficiency was lower than Melton’s or Podziemski’s, but his three made three-pointers helped Golden State maintain perimeter scoring.
Gary Payton II
Gary Payton II added 12 points in an efficient performance.
He shot 5-of-7 from the field and recorded:
- 12 points
- 4 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 1 turnover
- 3 steals
- +7
His three steals were especially valuable.
Payton’s defensive pressure complemented the scoring contributions from Golden State’s perimeter players.
Seth Curry
Seth Curry scored nine points on 2-of-4 shooting.
He also made 2-of-3 three-pointers and 3-of-4 free throws.
His plus/minus was +16, the best mark among the listed Golden State players.
That is a striking number because he scored only nine points.
It illustrates how a player’s impact can extend beyond scoring. His minutes were associated with Golden State winning by a significant margin.
Draymond Green’s Unusual Statistical Line
Draymond Green scored only one point, but his contribution cannot be judged from scoring alone.
His statistics were:
- 1 point
- 0-of-3 field goals
- 0-of-3 three-pointers
- 1-of-2 free throws
- 6 rebounds
- 7 assists
- 3 turnovers
- 1 steal
- 1 block
Seven assists were the highest total for either team.
Green’s passing helped Golden State move the ball and create scoring opportunities even though his own shot was not falling.
This is one of the clearest examples from the game of why traditional scoring statistics can hide important parts of a player’s role.
Team Statistical Comparison
The overall numbers provide a useful explanation for the final result.
| Statistic | Sacramento | Golden State |
| Points | 105 | 110 |
| Field Goals | 41-87 | 37-82 |
| Field-Goal % | 47% | 45% |
| Three-Pointers | 11-31 | 17-38 |
| Three-Point % | 35% | 45% |
| Free Throws | 12-17 | 19-24 |
| Free-Throw % | 71% | 79% |
| Rebounds | 41 | 39 |
| Assists | 22 | 27 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 17 |
| Steals | 9 | 10 |
| Blocks | 6 | 5 |
At first glance, Sacramento’s 47% field-goal percentage looks better than Golden State’s 45%.
Yet Golden State scored five more points.
The biggest explanation is the three-point line.
The Warriors made 17 three-pointers, while Sacramento made only 11.
That six-three difference represents 18 additional points from three-point makes.
Golden State also made seven more free throws.
Sacramento’s advantage in overall field-goal percentage was therefore not enough to overcome Golden State’s superior perimeter and free-throw production.
Why Golden State Won
The most important statistical lesson from this matchup is that shooting percentage alone does not determine the winner.
Golden State made:
- 17 three-pointers
- 19 free throws
- 27 assists
Sacramento made:
- 11 three-pointers
- 12 free throws
- 22 assists
Golden State’s six additional three-pointers were a major source of separation.
The Warriors also had five more assists.
Their 17 turnovers were a weakness, but Sacramento did not convert that advantage into enough scoring to win the game.
The Second Quarter Was the Turning Point
The second quarter deserves special attention.
Sacramento scored 27 points.
Golden State scored 41.
That means the Warriors gained 14 points in a single period.
The NBA’s official game information confirms the 41-27 second-quarter advantage.
That stretch effectively created the cushion Golden State needed.
Sacramento Won the Third Quarter
The Kings did not disappear after halftime.
They scored 28 points in the third quarter while holding Golden State to 19.
That nine-point advantage significantly reduced the Warriors’ lead.
This is important because the final result was not a wire-to-wire Golden State performance.
Instead, it was a game of momentum swings.
Golden State Closed Better
The Warriors scored 25 points in the fourth quarter compared with 24 for Sacramento.
The margin was small, but the timing was crucial.
The game was tied at 104 late before Curry and Podziemski produced the decisive sequence.
Golden State’s ability to execute late was ultimately more important than its overall field-goal percentage.
Shooting Efficiency Tells a Deeper Story
Sacramento’s 41-of-87 shooting produced a 47% field-goal percentage.
Golden State shot 37-of-82 for 45%.
If only those numbers were considered, Sacramento would appear to have the shooting advantage.
But basketball scoring is not equally weighted across the court.
Golden State’s 17-of-38 three-point shooting generated 51 points from three-point makes.
Sacramento’s 11-of-31 produced 33 points.
That is an 18-point advantage from made three-pointers.
This is the clearest statistical reason the Warriors could win despite making four fewer field goals overall.
Rebounding Battle
Sacramento collected 41 rebounds.
Golden State had 39.
The Kings therefore held a two-rebound advantage.
Charles Bassey led everyone with 12 rebounds, while Dylan Cardwell grabbed nine and Raynaud had seven.
The rebounding numbers show that Sacramento was competitive around the basket.
However, the two-rebound edge was not large enough to offset Golden State’s perimeter advantage.
Ball Movement
Golden State recorded 27 assists.
Sacramento recorded 22.
That five-assist advantage suggests the Warriors generated more of their offense through passing.
Draymond Green led the game with seven assists.
Melton followed with five, while Sacramento’s Devin Carter and Killian Hayes each recorded four assists.
The assist numbers are particularly interesting because Golden State’s offense was not simply based on individual shot creation.
The Warriors had several players contributing to ball movement.
Turnovers and Defensive Pressure
Sacramento committed 14 turnovers.
Golden State committed 17.
This was one statistical area where Sacramento had the advantage.
The Kings also recorded nine steals compared with Golden State’s 10.
Hayes led Sacramento with four steals.
Golden State’s Gary Payton II recorded three.
The Warriors’ higher turnover count could have become costly, but Sacramento’s advantage in ball security did not translate into enough additional scoring.
Plus/Minus: What It Tells Us
Plus/minus is useful, but it should be interpreted carefully.
For Golden State:
- Seth Curry: +16
- Charles Bassey: +9
- Brandin Podziemski: +8
- Stephen Curry: +6
- Gary Payton II: +7
For Sacramento:
- Precious Achiuwa: +3
- Dylan Cardwell: +1
- Nique Clifford: 0
- Killian Hayes: 0
- Malik Monk: -2
- Maxime Raynaud: -4
- Doug McDermott: -4
- Devin Carter: -7
- Daeqwon Plowden: -12
Seth Curry’s +16 is particularly notable.
He scored nine points, so his plus/minus was not simply a reflection of scoring output.
Meanwhile, Plowden scored 11 points but finished at -12.
That does not mean Plowden played badly. It means Golden State won the minutes associated with his time on the floor by 12 points.
Plus/minus should therefore be treated as lineup context rather than an isolated player-quality measurement.
Injury and Availability Context
The supplied data lists three Sacramento players as unavailable:
- Keegan Murray, left thumb
- Zach LaVine, left ankle sprain
- Drew Eubanks, right finger surgery
Golden State also had three listed DNPs:
- Gui Santos, right hip contusion
- Kristaps Porzingis, right knee soreness
- Will Richard, lower back soreness
Availability matters when analyzing a single-game box score.
A team’s rotation can change significantly when established players are unavailable, forcing less familiar players into larger roles.
The official NBA recap also noted that Golden State rookie Will Richard was a late scratch because of a back injury and that Pat Spencer moved into the starting lineup.
What the Player Stats Say About Sacramento
Sacramento’s numbers reveal a team that was capable of scoring efficiently inside the arc but struggled to match Golden State’s three-point production.
The Kings shot 47% overall, which is respectable.
They also had:
- 41 rebounds
- 22 assists
- 14 turnovers
- 9 steals
- 6 blocks
Those numbers indicate a competitive all-around performance.
The biggest weakness was not a complete offensive collapse.
It was the inability to generate enough high-value perimeter scoring.
The Kings made 11 of 31 three-point attempts.
Golden State made 17 of 38.
That difference was decisive.
What the Player Stats Say About Golden State
Golden State’s statistics show a team that used perimeter shooting and balanced contributions to overcome some weaknesses.
The Warriors turned 17 made three-pointers into a major scoring advantage.
They also had seven players in double figures:
- De’Anthony Melton: 21
- Brandin Podziemski: 20
- Stephen Curry: 17
- Charles Bassey: 14
- Pat Spencer: 14
- Gary Payton II: 12
- Seth Curry: 9
Strictly speaking, Seth Curry did not reach double figures, so the Warriors had six players at 10 or more points.
That balanced distribution mattered because Sacramento could not focus its defensive attention on only one scorer.
The Most Important Individual Performances
If the game is evaluated by different statistical categories, several players stand out.
- Best scorer: De’Anthony Melton, 21 points.
- Best Sacramento scorer: Killian Hayes, 18 points.
- Best rebounder: Charles Bassey, 12 rebounds.
- Best passer: Draymond Green, 7 assists.
- Best defensive activity: Killian Hayes with 4 steals.
- Best rim protection: Dylan Cardwell with 3 blocks.
- Best plus/minus: Seth Curry at +16.
Most important late-game sequence: Stephen Curry tying the game with a three-pointer before assisting Brandin Podziemski for the go-ahead three.
This broader view gives a much more accurate picture than simply identifying the highest scorer.
How the Game Could Have Gone Differently
Sacramento was close enough that a few statistical changes could have changed the result.
The first possibility was better three-point efficiency.
The Kings made 11 of 31 from deep.
If they had made only three more three-pointers at the same number of attempts, they would have added nine points and potentially changed the outcome.
The second possibility was the second quarter.
A 41-point Golden State quarter is difficult to overcome.
If Sacramento had limited Golden State to something closer to 30 points during that period, the Kings would have entered the second half in a much stronger position.
The third factor was late-game execution.
The game was tied at 104 before Golden State’s decisive sequence.
That means the entire five-point final margin was created in the closing minutes.
A Closer Look at the Four Quarters
First Quarter
Sacramento scored 26 points and Golden State scored 25.
The opening period was essentially even.
The Kings had a one-point advantage entering the second quarter.
Second Quarter
Golden State completely changed the game.
The Warriors scored 41 points.
Sacramento scored 27.
Golden State therefore gained a 14-point advantage during the period.
This was the largest quarter-by-quarter swing of the game.
Third Quarter
Sacramento responded.
The Kings scored 28 points.
Golden State managed only 19.
That gave Sacramento a nine-point advantage and brought the game back into competitive territory.
Fourth Quarter
Golden State scored 25.
Sacramento scored 24.
The Warriors therefore won the final period by only one point, but that was enough after their second-quarter advantage.
Historical and Series Context
The supplied data states that Golden State held a 2-1 season-series lead before the April 11 matchup.
That makes this result meaningful in the broader matchup context.
However, the supplied standings information contains an internal inconsistency.
The game-level data lists Golden State at 37-42 and Sacramento at 21-59, while another portion of the supplied material lists Golden State at 37-45 and Sacramento at 22-60.
Those records cannot describe the same point in the season immediately around this game.
For that reason, the most reliable figures for this article are the game-specific statistics and final score. The official NBA game page confirms the 110-105 result and the April 7 game date, while the official recap provides the main game narrative.
Readers who need standings should always verify the standings separately from the individual game box score.
Where to Verify Official Game Information
For readers who want to cross-check the final score, quarter breakdown, attendance, officials, and game summary, the NBA official game page is the most appropriate primary source. NBA official game summary and box score
Using a primary league source is especially useful when publishing player-stat articles because secondary databases can occasionally display different date labels, rounding, or standings snapshots.
How to Read a Match Player Stats Box Score Properly
A box score becomes much more useful when you avoid looking at points alone.
Start with five questions.
Who scored efficiently?
Look at field-goal attempts alongside made shots.
A player who scores 18 points on 6-of-13 shooting has a different offensive profile from a player scoring 18 on 6-of-20.
Who created shots for teammates?
Assists reveal some of the passing contribution.
In this game, Draymond Green’s seven assists were more significant than his one point.
Who controlled the glass?
Rebounding can create additional possessions and prevent second chances.
Bassey’s 12 rebounds were a major contribution.
Who created defensive events?
Steals and blocks reveal disruptive defensive activity.
Hayes had four steals, while Cardwell had three blocks.
Who influenced winning stretches?
Plus/minus can provide additional context, although it should never be treated as a standalone rating.
Seth Curry’s +16 demonstrates how a relatively modest scoring total can coexist with highly positive team minutes.
Why This Game Is Useful for Basketball Analysis
This matchup is a good example of why advanced basketball interpretation begins with the basic box score but should not end there.
Sacramento had the better overall field-goal percentage.
Sacramento also had fewer turnovers and more rebounds.
Yet Golden State won.
Why?
Because Golden State created more value from three-point shooting and free throws, moved the ball more effectively, and executed the critical late possessions.
That is a much more useful lesson than simply saying the Warriors scored more points.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the Kings in scoring against the Warriors?
Killian Hayes led Sacramento with 18 points. He also recorded four rebounds, four assists, and four steals.
Who led Golden State in scoring?
De’Anthony Melton led the Warriors with 21 points on 7-of-12 shooting, including 4-of-6 from three-point range.
What was the final score?
Golden State defeated Sacramento 110-105 at Chase Center.
Who had the most rebounds?
Charles Bassey led all players with 12 rebounds for Golden State.
Who had the most assists?
Draymond Green led the game with seven assists.
Why did Golden State win?
The Warriors’ 17 made three-pointers compared with Sacramento’s 11 were a major difference. Golden State also made more free throws and recorded five more assists.
Conclusion
The sacramento kings vs golden state warriors match player stats from this matchup reveal a much closer contest than the final score alone suggests.
Golden State won 110-105 after Sacramento led 26-25 through the opening quarter. The Warriors’ 41-point second quarter created the decisive cushion, while Sacramento answered with a strong third quarter before Golden State closed the game in the final minutes.
De’Anthony Melton led Golden State with 21 points, while Brandin Podziemski added 20 and Stephen Curry scored 17. Curry’s importance was especially visible late, when he tied the game at 104 before helping create Podziemski’s go-ahead three-pointer.
For Sacramento, Killian Hayes led all Kings scorers with 18 points, while Maxime Raynaud scored 17 and Doug McDermott added 16. Hayes also produced four steals, and Dylan Cardwell provided three blocks.
The statistical difference was primarily perimeter scoring. Sacramento shot 47% from the field compared with Golden State’s 45%, but the Warriors made 17 three-pointers to Sacramento’s 11. That six-make difference from beyond the arc created an 18-point advantage from three-point field goals alone.
The game also demonstrates why player evaluation should consider more than points. Green scored only one point but supplied seven assists. Bassey scored 14 while leading the game with 12 rebounds. Seth Curry scored nine but finished with the game’s best listed plus/minus at +16.
Taken together, the numbers show that Golden State did not win because Sacramento played poorly in every area. The Kings actually won several statistical categories. The Warriors won because their strengths in three-point shooting, ball movement, free-throw production, and late-game execution outweighed Sacramento’s advantages.
