Detroit Pistons vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats

The detroit pistons vs charlotte hornets match player stats from April 11, 2026, tell a much clearer story than the 118-100 final score alone. Detroit defeated Charlotte at Spectrum Center in a game where efficient shooting, balanced scoring, stronger ball movement, and a dominant fourth quarter separated the teams. Jalen Duren led Detroit with 20 points and 9 rebounds, while Duncan Robinson added 19 points. Cade Cunningham controlled the offense with 7 assists, and Ausar Thompson contributed across several areas with 12 points, 5 rebounds, 6 assists, and 3 steals. For Charlotte, LaMelo Ball produced 27 points and 8 assists, with Brandon Miller adding 22 points, but the Hornets could not maintain their offensive pressure after halftime.

This matchup is particularly interesting because the teams followed very different paths to the final result. Charlotte actually scored 35 points in the second quarter and entered halftime with a competitive offensive rhythm. Detroit, however, finished the game with a 25 to 10 advantage in the fourth quarter. That final period turned a relatively competitive contest into an 18-point Detroit victory.

The numbers also show why Detroit won. The Pistons shot 51% from the field compared with Charlotte’s 39%, collected 49 rebounds compared with 41, and recorded 29 assists compared with 16. Charlotte had the better free throw percentage and made more three-pointers, but Detroit’s overall shot-making and offensive efficiency proved more important.

Detroit Pistons vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats Overview

The game was played on April 11, 2026, at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina, with an attendance of 19,623.

Category	Detroit Pistons	Charlotte Hornets
Final Score	118	100
Field Goals	45-89	34-88
Field Goal %	51%	39%
3-Pointers	9-27	13-47
3-Point %	33%	28%
Free Throws	19-26	19-23
Free Throw %	73%	83%
Rebounds	49	41
Assists	29	16
Turnovers	13	15
Steals	13	10
Blocks	8	8

Detroit’s advantage was most obvious in overall shooting and passing.

The Pistons converted 45 of 89 field goal attempts, while Charlotte made only 34 of 88. That created an 11-field-goal difference despite the Hornets attempting almost the same number of shots.

Detroit also generated 29 assists, nearly twice Charlotte’s 16. That difference suggests that Detroit was able to create more efficient scoring opportunities through ball movement and offensive structure rather than relying as heavily on individual shot creation.

Charlotte’s 13 made three-pointers were actually four more than Detroit’s nine. However, the Hornets attempted 47 shots from beyond the arc and converted only 28%. Detroit’s 33% accuracy from three-point range was considerably more efficient.

How the Game Developed Quarter by Quarter

The scoring pattern provides an important explanation for the final result.

Quarter	Detroit	Charlotte
1st	36	30
2nd	32	35
3rd	25	25
4th	25	10
Total	118	100

Detroit opened the game strongly, scoring 36 points in the first quarter. Charlotte responded with 35 points in the second, cutting into Detroit’s early momentum.

The third quarter was completely even at 25 points apiece. At that stage, the game remained competitive enough that the fourth quarter was likely to determine the winner.

That is exactly what happened.

Detroit scored 25 points in the final period while Charlotte managed only 10. The Hornets’ fourth-quarter offensive decline was the defining statistical development of the game.

Detroit’s Strong Start

The Pistons’ 36-point first quarter immediately established an offensive advantage. Their 51% shooting for the game indicates that the early production was not simply the result of an unsustainable shooting burst.

Detroit ultimately produced contributions from several players, allowing the offense to remain productive even when one particular player was not dominating the scoring column.

Jalen Duren’s interior efficiency was especially valuable. He made 8 of 11 field goal attempts and all four of his free throws, finishing with 20 points.

Duncan Robinson provided another important scoring outlet. His 19 points came on 6 of 11 shooting, including 3 of 7 from three-point range.

Charlotte’s Second-Quarter Response

Charlotte’s 35-point second quarter showed that the Hornets were capable of putting pressure on Detroit’s defense.

LaMelo Ball was the central offensive creator. He finished with 27 points, 5 rebounds, and 8 assists. His 6 made three-pointers were particularly important because Charlotte needed perimeter production to keep pace with Detroit.

Brandon Miller also delivered an efficient scoring contribution by making 9 of 20 field goal attempts and finishing with 22 points.

Despite those individual performances, Charlotte could not sustain the same offensive output throughout the game.

The Decisive Fourth Quarter

The fourth quarter is the clearest dividing line in the box score.

Detroit scored 25 points.

Charlotte scored only 10.

That 15-point difference in one quarter was larger than the final margin needed to explain why Detroit won by 18 points.

Charlotte’s overall 39% field goal percentage became particularly damaging as the game progressed. A team can survive a poor shooting night when it creates extra possessions, dominates the offensive glass, or generates a large free throw advantage. Charlotte did not gain enough of those advantages to compensate.

Detroit, meanwhile, continued to get efficient looks and protected its lead.

Detroit Pistons Player Stats

Detroit received meaningful production from both its starters and bench.

Jalen Duren

Jalen Duren was one of Detroit’s most efficient performers.

• 20 points
• 9 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 8-11 field goals
• 4-4 free throws

Duren’s 8-for-11 shooting translates to an excellent 72.7% field goal rate from the attempts provided.

His scoring was also efficient because he did not need a high volume of attempts to reach 20 points. He combined finishing around the basket with perfect free throw shooting.

His nine rebounds led Detroit, making him important on both ends of the floor.

The four assists are another useful detail. Duren was not simply a finisher. His passing contribution added another dimension to Detroit’s interior offense.

Duncan Robinson

Duncan Robinson scored 19 points on 6-of-11 shooting.

His line included:

• 19 points
• 3 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 6-11 field goals
• 3-7 three-pointers
• 4-6 free throws

Robinson’s three made three-pointers helped stretch Charlotte’s defense.

His 3-for-7 performance from outside was also more efficient than Charlotte’s overall three-point shooting. Robinson gave Detroit perimeter scoring without requiring an unusually large number of attempts.

Cade Cunningham

Cade Cunningham finished with:

• 14 points
• 2 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 7-13 field goals

The seven assists are arguably the most important part of his individual statistical line.

Detroit finished with 29 assists as a team, and Cunningham was the leading facilitator. His 7-for-13 shooting also indicates that he contributed as a scorer without sacrificing efficiency.

A 14-point performance can appear modest next to Duren’s 20 or Robinson’s 19, but the combination of scoring and playmaking made Cunningham’s overall contribution more significant than his point total alone suggests.

Ausar Thompson

Ausar Thompson produced one of Detroit’s most complete statistical lines:

• 12 points
• 5 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 3 steals
• 5-8 field goals

His 5-of-8 shooting was efficient, while the six assists placed him second on Detroit in the supplied statistics.

The three steals were also significant. Detroit recorded 13 steals as a team, and Thompson’s defensive activity contributed directly to that total.

This is a good example of why player evaluation should not focus only on scoring.

Tobias Harris

Tobias Harris finished with:

• 8 points
• 6 rebounds
• 3-5 field goals
• 1-1 three-point shooting
• 1-3 free throws

Harris did not need a large scoring role in this game. His six rebounds and efficient 3-of-5 field goal shooting complemented Detroit’s higher-volume scorers.

Detroit’s Bench Production

Detroit’s bench also added several useful contributions.

Ronald Holland II scored 13 points and collected five rebounds. His scoring gave Detroit another reliable source of offense outside its primary starters.

Daniss Jenkins added six points, one rebound, three assists, and two steals.

Caris LeVert contributed six points, two rebounds, three assists, and two steals.

Javonte Green finished with six points and two rebounds.

Isaiah Stewart recorded five points, three rebounds, and two blocks.

Paul Reed added four points and seven rebounds, providing additional work on the glass.

Kevin Huerter finished with five points, three rebounds, and three assists.

These contributions helped Detroit maintain offensive balance.

Marcus Sasser and Chaz Lanier did not score, while Sasser recorded one rebound and one assist.

Charlotte Hornets Player Stats

Charlotte’s best individual performances came from LaMelo Ball and Brandon Miller, but the supporting numbers were not enough to overcome Detroit’s team efficiency.

LaMelo Ball

LaMelo Ball was Charlotte’s leading scorer and primary offensive creator.

His line:

• 27 points
• 5 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 2 steals
• 7-20 field goals
• 6-16 three-pointers
• 7-7 free throws

The 27 points were the highest individual scoring total in the game.

Ball’s six made three-pointers were also a major part of Charlotte’s offense. However, he needed 20 field goal attempts to reach his scoring total.

His perfect 7-for-7 free throw shooting helped improve the efficiency of his overall scoring contribution.

The eight assists were equally important. Ball was Charlotte’s leading passer and helped create opportunities for teammates.

Brandon Miller

Brandon Miller added:

• 22 points
• 3 rebounds
• 4 steals
• 9-20 field goals
• 2-8 three-pointers

Miller’s 22 points made him Charlotte’s second-leading scorer.

His four steals were particularly notable. Charlotte finished with 10 steals as a team, so Miller accounted for a substantial portion of that defensive activity.

However, his 2-of-8 three-point shooting shows one of the larger problems facing Charlotte. The Hornets generated perimeter attempts but did not convert them at a high enough rate.

Miles Bridges

Miles Bridges finished with:

• 10 points
• 8 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 3-7 field goals

His eight rebounds led Charlotte.

Bridges also provided three assists, giving him a broader contribution than his 10-point scoring total suggests.

Still, Charlotte needed more scoring from its frontcourt to complement Ball and Miller.

Kon Knueppel

Kon Knueppel recorded:

• 10 points
• 4 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 4-12 field goals
• 2-8 three-pointers

Knueppel reached double figures but struggled with efficiency.

The 4-of-12 field goal mark and 2-of-8 three-point performance illustrate the broader Charlotte shooting issue.

Moussa Diabate

Moussa Diabate finished with eight points, six rebounds, and two assists.

His six rebounds were useful in a game where Charlotte was outrebounded 49-41.

Coby White

Coby White provided 11 points, two rebounds, and one assist.

His scoring was important because Charlotte needed additional offensive support beyond Ball and Miller.

The remaining Charlotte contributors included Grant Williams with two points, four rebounds, and four steals; Xavier Tillman with two points and two rebounds; Ryan Kalkbrenner with four points, four rebounds, and one assist; Tre Mann with two points; Sion James with two points and three rebounds; and Pat Connaughton and Josh Green without points.

Comparing the Starting Lineups

Detroit started Tobias Harris, Duncan Robinson, Jalen Duren, Cade Cunningham, and Ausar Thompson.

Charlotte started Miles Bridges, Moussa Diabate, Brandon Miller, LaMelo Ball, and Kon Knueppel.

The contrast between the starting groups is interesting because Charlotte had two high-volume perimeter scorers in Ball and Miller, while Detroit’s starting group generated a more distributed offensive profile.

Detroit’s starting lineup combined:

• Duren’s interior efficiency
• Robinson’s perimeter shooting
• Cunningham’s playmaking
• Thompson’s defensive activity
• Harris’s rebounding and efficient shooting

That combination helped Detroit avoid becoming overly dependent on one scorer.

Charlotte, by comparison, leaned heavily on Ball and Miller for offensive production.

Shooting Efficiency Was the Biggest Difference

The most important statistical difference was field goal percentage.

Detroit: 51%

Charlotte: 39%

That 12-percentage-point gap is substantial.

Detroit made 45 field goals.

Charlotte made 34.

Both teams attempted nearly the same number of shots, meaning the difference was primarily about conversion rather than volume.

The Pistons also had the advantage in two other important areas: rebounds and assists.

Detroit grabbed eight more rebounds and produced 13 more assists.

Those three numbers together create a strong explanation for the victory:

Better shooting + more rebounds + more assists = greater offensive efficiency and more controlled possessions.

Three-Point Shooting Tells a More Complicated Story

At first glance, Charlotte’s three-point production might look like an advantage.

The Hornets made 13 three-pointers.

Detroit made nine.

But the percentages tell a different story.

Detroit shot 33% from three-point range.

Charlotte shot 28%.

Charlotte attempted 47 three-pointers compared with Detroit’s 27. That means the Hornets relied much more heavily on perimeter volume.

This strategy can work when a team converts efficiently. In this game, however, the low percentage meant Charlotte sacrificed a large number of possessions for relatively limited returns.

LaMelo Ball was the main exception. He made 6 of 16 three-point attempts, accounting for nearly half of Charlotte’s made threes.

Rebounding Battle

Detroit won the rebounding battle 49-41.

Jalen Duren led Detroit with nine rebounds, while Miles Bridges led Charlotte with eight.

Paul Reed added seven rebounds for Detroit, and Tobias Harris collected six.

For Charlotte, Moussa Diabate had six rebounds.

The eight-rebound advantage does not appear enormous in isolation, but it matters when combined with the shooting difference.

Detroit was not only converting shots at a higher rate. The Pistons were also securing more possessions through rebounding.

That combination can create a major difference over 48 minutes.

Assists and Ball Movement

Detroit recorded 29 assists.

Charlotte recorded 16.

The 13-assist difference is one of the clearest indicators of offensive organization in this matchup.

Cade Cunningham led Detroit with seven assists, while Ausar Thompson added six. Charlotte’s LaMelo Ball led the Hornets with eight.

The key difference is that Detroit received multiple significant passing contributions.

Cunningham and Thompson combined for 13 assists.

Charlotte’s offense depended much more heavily on Ball to create.

This distinction matters because an offense becomes harder to defend when several players can initiate or facilitate possessions.

Turnovers and Defensive Activity

Detroit committed 13 turnovers.

Charlotte committed 15.

The two-turnover difference was relatively small.

However, Detroit recorded 13 steals compared with Charlotte’s 10.

Both teams recorded eight blocks.

The defensive statistics therefore show that neither team completely dominated the other defensively in every category. Detroit’s biggest advantage came from combining defensive activity with much better offensive efficiency.

Ausar Thompson’s three steals and Caris LeVert’s two steals were notable Detroit contributions.

Brandon Miller recorded four steals for Charlotte, while Grant Williams also produced four.

Free Throw Comparison

Charlotte actually had the better free throw percentage.

Detroit shot 73% from the free throw line.

Charlotte shot 83%.

Both teams made 19 free throws.

The difference was that Detroit attempted 26 free throws while Charlotte attempted 23.

This is an interesting reminder that a team can have the better free throw percentage without winning the free throw battle overall.

Detroit’s 19 made free throws contributed 19 points, while Charlotte also received 19 points from the line.

Therefore, free throws did not determine the final outcome.

The bigger differences came from field goals, rebounds, assists, and fourth-quarter scoring.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Detroit

The Detroit numbers point toward a balanced offensive performance.

Duren scored 20.

Robinson scored 19.

Cunningham scored 14.

Thompson scored 12.

Holland II scored 13.

Several other players contributed between four and eight points.

That balance made Detroit difficult to shut down.

If Charlotte focused heavily on one scorer, other Detroit players could still create offense.

The Pistons also had multiple playmakers. Cunningham’s seven assists and Thompson’s six assists were particularly valuable.

The result was an offense that combined interior finishing, perimeter shooting, passing, and transition opportunities.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Charlotte

Charlotte’s numbers tell a different story.

Ball scored 27.

Miller scored 22.

White scored 11.

Bridges and Knueppel each scored 10.

After that, the scoring dropped significantly.

Charlotte therefore received strong individual production from its two primary scorers, but not enough efficient support around them.

The Hornets also attempted 47 three-pointers and made only 13.

That is not necessarily a bad strategy by itself. High-volume three-point shooting can create an advantage when the shots fall.

Here, however, the 28% conversion rate limited the value of that approach.

Why the Fourth Quarter Changed Everything

The fourth quarter deserves special attention because it explains the difference between a close game and an 18-point win.

Detroit and Charlotte both scored 25 points in the third quarter.

That meant the teams entered the final period with Detroit still holding its overall advantage but without a decisive separation based on third-quarter scoring.

Then Detroit outscored Charlotte 25-10.

Charlotte’s offense effectively disappeared compared with its earlier production.

The Hornets had scored 30, 35, and 25 points in the first three quarters.

Then they produced only 10.

Detroit’s defense and Charlotte’s declining shot efficiency combined to produce the decisive stretch.

This is one of the strongest examples of why quarter-by-quarter statistics are useful when analyzing a final score.

A Closer Look at Individual Efficiency

Raw points are useful, but shooting efficiency adds another layer.

Jalen Duren scored 20 points on 11 field goal attempts and made all four of his free throws.

Duncan Robinson scored 19 on 11 field goal attempts.

Cade Cunningham scored 14 on 13 attempts.

Ausar Thompson scored 12 on only eight attempts.

Those numbers show different offensive roles.

Duren and Thompson were particularly efficient based on the provided field goal attempts.

For Charlotte, Ball’s 27 points required 20 field goal attempts, while Miller’s 22 points required 20 attempts.

Both players carried significant offensive workloads.

That workload was necessary because Charlotte did not receive enough efficient scoring from the rest of the lineup.

Detroit’s Defensive Contributions

Detroit finished with 13 steals and eight blocks.

Ausar Thompson’s three steals stood out.

Caris LeVert and Daniss Jenkins each added two steals.

Isaiah Stewart contributed two blocks.

The Pistons’ defensive production was spread across several players rather than being concentrated in one individual.

That is important because defensive success often comes from multiple possessions rather than one spectacular play.

Detroit’s ability to generate turnovers also gave its offense additional opportunities.

Charlotte’s Defensive Contributions

Charlotte recorded 10 steals and eight blocks.

Brandon Miller had four steals.

Grant Williams also recorded four steals.

Those two players accounted for eight of Charlotte’s 10 steals.

The Hornets therefore showed strong defensive activity from specific players, even though the overall defensive result was not enough to stop Detroit’s offense.

The biggest problem was not a complete absence of defensive plays. It was the inability to consistently turn those plays into a sustained scoring advantage.

The Most Important Statistical Takeaways

Several numbers stand above the rest when evaluating this game.

1. Detroit’s 51% field goal shooting

The Pistons converted 45 of 89 attempts.

That efficiency created a strong foundation for the entire offense.

2. Charlotte’s 39% field goal shooting

The Hornets made only 34 of 88 attempts.

The nearly identical shot volume compared with Detroit makes this difference especially important.

3. Detroit’s 29 assists

The Pistons moved the ball effectively and received playmaking from several players.

4. Charlotte’s 16 assists

The Hornets had a much lower level of team-assisted offense.

5. Detroit’s 49 rebounds

The eight-rebound advantage gave the Pistons additional control over possessions.

6. The 25-10 fourth quarter

This was the decisive scoring period.

7. LaMelo Ball’s 27 points and 8 assists

Ball was Charlotte’s most productive offensive player and primary creator.

8. Jalen Duren’s 20 points and 9 rebounds

Duren delivered Detroit’s strongest interior statistical performance.

A Note About the Supplied Record Data

There is a small inconsistency in the supplied game information that should be acknowledged rather than silently repeated.

The game data lists Detroit’s record as 59-22 and Charlotte’s as 43-38 in one section. Another standings entry lists Detroit at 60-22 and Charlotte at 44-38.

Because those figures conflict, the player and team statistics are more reliable for analyzing this individual matchup than using either record line as definitive.

There is also a wording inconsistency in the supplied scoring summary. It identifies Duncan Robinson as Detroit’s leading scorer with 19 points while the detailed player statistics show Jalen Duren scored 20. The detailed player line clearly places Duren ahead of Robinson in this game.

For accuracy, this article treats Duren’s 20 points as Detroit’s highest individual scoring total and Robinson’s 19 as the second-highest among the supplied Detroit player lines.

That distinction matters when publishing sports statistics because a seemingly small labeling error can change the interpretation of an entire game.

Why These Stats Matter for Future Matchups

A single game should not be used to make broad claims about an entire season, but the statistical profile provides useful information for evaluating team performance.

Detroit’s 29 assists suggest that its offense can be effective when several players participate in creating scoring opportunities.

The Pistons also showed strong interior efficiency through Duren and good perimeter production from Robinson.

Charlotte’s numbers show the importance of improving shot efficiency when relying heavily on three-point volume.

The Hornets made 13 threes, but the 28% accuracy prevented that volume from becoming a meaningful offensive advantage.

For analysts, coaches, and fans, this is the type of distinction that makes box-score analysis more useful than simply listing the highest scorers.

Player Performance Summary

Detroit Pistons

Player	PTS	REB	AST	Additional Stats
Jalen Duren	20	9	4	8-11 FG, 4-4 FT
Duncan Robinson	19	3	1	6-11 FG, 3-7 3PT
Cade Cunningham	14	2	7	7-13 FG
Ronald Holland II	13	5	0
Ausar Thompson	12	5	6	3 STL, 5-8 FG
Tobias Harris	8	6	0	3-5 FG
Caris LeVert	6	2	3	2 STL
Javonte Green	6	2	0
Daniss Jenkins	6	1	3	2 STL
Kevin Huerter	5	3	3
Isaiah Stewart	5	3	0	2 BLK
Paul Reed	4	7	0
Marcus Sasser	0	1	1
Chaz Lanier	0	0	0

Charlotte Hornets

Player	PTS	REB	AST	Additional Stats
LaMelo Ball	27	5	8	6-16 3PT, 7-7 FT
Brandon Miller	22	3	0	4 STL, 9-20 FG
Coby White	11	2	1
Miles Bridges	10	8	3	3-7 FG
Kon Knueppel	10	4	1	2-8 3PT
Moussa Diabate	8	6	2
Ryan Kalkbrenner	4	4	1
Grant Williams	2	4	0	4 STL
Xavier Tillman	2	2	0
Tre Mann	2	0	0
Sion James	2	3	0
Pat Connaughton	0	0	0
Josh Green	0	0	0

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Detroit Pistons in scoring against the Charlotte Hornets?

Jalen Duren led Detroit with 20 points. He shot 8-of-11 from the field and made all four of his free throws.

Who led the Charlotte Hornets in scoring?

LaMelo Ball led Charlotte with 27 points. He also recorded five rebounds, eight assists, and two steals.

What was the final score between Detroit and Charlotte?

Detroit defeated Charlotte 118-100 on April 11, 2026, at Spectrum Center.

Which team shot better from the field?

Detroit shot 51% from the field, while Charlotte shot 39%. This was one of the biggest statistical advantages in the game.

Who had the most assists?

LaMelo Ball led Charlotte with eight assists, while Cade Cunningham led Detroit with seven. Detroit had 29 team assists compared with Charlotte’s 16.

Why did Detroit win the game?

Detroit combined better field goal shooting, stronger rebounding, more assists, and a decisive fourth quarter. The Pistons outscored Charlotte 25-10 in the final period.

Conclusion

The detroit pistons vs charlotte hornets match player stats from April 11, 2026, show that Detroit’s 118-100 victory was built on more than one standout performance.

Jalen Duren’s 20 points and nine rebounds gave Detroit efficient interior production. Duncan Robinson added 19 points with three made three-pointers. Cade Cunningham contributed seven assists, while Ausar Thompson filled the box score with 12 points, five rebounds, six assists, and three steals.

Charlotte received excellent scoring from LaMelo Ball and Brandon Miller. Ball’s 27 points and eight assists made him the game’s leading scorer, while Miller added 22 points and four steals. Yet Charlotte’s overall shooting efficiency remained a major weakness. The Hornets shot only 39% from the field and 28% from three-point range.

The biggest team-level differences were just as important. Detroit shot 51%, collected 49 rebounds, and recorded 29 assists. Charlotte finished with 41 rebounds and 16 assists. The decisive moment came in the fourth quarter, when Detroit scored 25 points and Charlotte managed only 10.

Taken together, the statistics show a Detroit team that won through efficiency, balance, ball movement, and late-game execution. Charlotte’s leading players produced strong individual numbers, but the team could not maintain its offensive effectiveness over the full 48 minutes.

For anyone examining this matchup through a statistical lens, the lesson is straightforward: the final score becomes much easier to understand when individual production is connected to shooting efficiency, rebounding, assists, turnovers, and quarter-by-quarter performance.